Below are the blockers/critical - removed bare metal related ones from the
list.
Alena - can you review 1791 and see if you can fix it or may be someone else
can pick it up if they have expertise in this area
Prachi - Same with 1776 - can you review and set it unassigned if this is not
in your
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:27:44PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:39:03AM -0400, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:01:49AM -0500, prasanna wrote:
> > > On 8 March 2013 22:24, Alex Huang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm going to start off a branch spe
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:44:35PM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> Below are the blockers/critical - removed bare metal related ones from the
> list.
>
> Alena - can you review 1791 and see if you can fix it or may be someone else
> can pick it up if they have expertise in this area
> Prachi -
On 3/22/13 12:49 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>
>After running through the steps, I get this error:
>
> mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl
>:cloud-marvin integration-test
> ERROR: transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use
> ERROR: JDWP Transport
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-889
I see notes about testing in the parent ticket (the feature ticket), but
I don't see any assignee or progress noted on testing this feature in
the QA task. Can someone update the QA task and resolve if we're done
testing?
If there are *enhance
Chip
Can we consider adding "CLOUDSTACK-1733 [ACS41][UI] Add guest network is
missing ip range fields and missing network offerings" to the list below?
I don't see how one can create networks - unless they use API calls or
CloudMonkey.
Thanks
ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip C
CLOUDSTACK-827 is to document the new Advanced Search feature that Brian
developed. It's still unassigned and no work appears to have been done
yet. Should I promote this to an improvement, and tie the docs to
4.1.1? I'm assuming that nobody has these docs squirrelled away
somewhere, just waiting
Which hypervisor?
On 3/22/13 4:19 AM, "Sean Truman" wrote:
>All,
>
>I would like to use NFS over RDMA using the -o rdma option flag on the
>mount command on primary storage is there a script that would allow me
>to do this or could you point me in the right direction in the code to
>make the nec
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:12:25PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Chip
>
> Can we consider adding "CLOUDSTACK-1733 [ACS41][UI] Add guest network is
> missing ip range fields and missing network offerings" to the list below?
It's a blocker for the release.
Sudha, not sure why it's not in the li
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:07:48PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>
>
> On 3/22/13 12:49 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >After running through the steps, I get this error:
> >
> > mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl
> >:cloud-marvin integration-test
> > E
Ah! Triaged it and targeted it to 4.1 - Now it shows up in the list.
Also deprioritized the following defect to Major instead of critical - still
targeted it to 4.1 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-590
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sun
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:24:07PM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> Ah! Triaged it and targeted it to 4.1 - Now it shows up in the list.
Gotcha. Timing problems! Thanks Sudha.
>
> Also deprioritized the following defect to Major instead of critical - still
> targeted it to 4.1 - https://issu
Thanks Sudha and Chip.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 4:26 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Blocker Defects to cut RC
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:24:07PM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote
Hello Mice,
I asked the following question on the community already. Since the following
thread is active, I am reposting the question again in this email thread for
answers that will help me work with the feature on XenServer,
Thank you,
Chandan.
-Original Message-
From: Chandan Purus
> -Original Message-
> From: Kausal Malladi [mailto:mkau...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 12:36 PM
> To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Issue regarding SSVM on DevCloud
>
> Hi,
> I was able to create a zone and configure it successfully. But have problem
> wit
Team,
I am going over the resolved Critical / Blocker defects and closing them based
on testing done so far. But there are few defects recently resolved for which
testing is either still in progress or I do not have the results to triage them
and close them. Can you take action for your defects
Corrected query to narrow down to 41 defects - 98 belong to this release
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20priority%20in%20(Blocker%2C%20Critical)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%224.1.0%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20OR
Sudha,
See my comments to 1791; it should be re-assigned to Edison as it happens
in the code he wrote for Storage management.
-Alena.
On 3/22/13 12:44 PM, "Sudha Ponnaganti"
wrote:
>Below are the blockers/critical - removed bare metal related ones from
>the list.
>
>Alena - can you review 17
Then how can the template be downloaded if I am not able to connect to
internet from SSVM?
Thanks.
Kausal Malladi
www.kausalmalladi.tk
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kausal Malladi [mailto:mkau...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 22
KVM Sorry!
v/r
Sean
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> Which hypervisor?
>
> On 3/22/13 4:19 AM, "Sean Truman" wrote:
>
>>All,
>>
>>I would like to use NFS over RDMA using the -o rdma option flag on the
>>mount command on primary storage is there a script that would allo
Hi,
I am using DevCloud for Secondary Storage. SSVM is started but Console
Proxy VM is not.
On dashboard it gives Alert State Detected.
I am able to ping my machine from SSVM.
Can someone explain how I can get out of this?
Thanks.
Kausal Malladi
www.kausalmalladi.tk
The default tty linux is preinstalled inside devcloud VM, so at least, there is
one user VM template is available.
But downloading a new template won't work.
For better network support, you may need to try devcloud-kvm:
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/devcloud-kvm.html
> -Original Messa
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:06:26AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:57 AM, "Chip Childers"
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:50:38AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
The task of creating the 4.1 Release Notes is tracked in the bug noted
below. This is the time in the release cycle where lots of ideas pop up
about things we should be sure to mention in the Release Notes. It would be
great to have a way to keep track of those ideas. I've started by adding a
coupl
I pulled latest master today, build also failed for me, but it failed at
running this unit test case (different from yours):
T E S T S
---
Running com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 2, Errors:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10094/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
see bug:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013, at 05:39 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> The task of creating the 4.1 Release Notes is tracked in the bug noted
> below. This is the time in the release cycle where lots of ideas pop up
> about things we should be sure to mention in the Release Notes. It would
> be great to have
I would like to propose a new feature - "Internal Load Balancing between
VPC tiers". With the feature support, you can set up the Load Balancer
inside the VPC without facing the public network side. It will allow to
balance internal traffic between tiers inside the VPC - for example,
traffic comin
Maybe extend to netscaler and also regular networks?
I filed a ticket recently for the same feature request.
Francois
On 2013-03-22 6:58 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
wrote:
> I would like to propose a new feature - "Internal Load Balancing between
> VPC tiers". With the feature support, you can set
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10072/
---
(Updated March 22, 2013, 11:13 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chi
Francois,
We do plan to support a Netscaler VPX as an Internal LB provider - I've
mentioned it in the spec.
The reason we adding support for VPC networks only - most of the customers
are interested in this particular use case to be supported. Due to limited
time frame for dev/qa I'm planning to c
This is now resolved - RB should work again. Please test and let me
know if that isn't the case.
--David
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:07 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6042
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Pradeep Soundararajan
> wrote:
>> Yes, I am unabl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10071/
---
(Updated March 22, 2013, 11:55 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kelven Yang
Can *you* check it first please? Does it apply cleanly? Does it compile?
On Mar 22, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati
wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
Chip, Vijay:
Let me know When the build is ready, I can help test if baremetal feature has
been deactivated from UI.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 5:04 PM
To: ; Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Cc: Frank Zhang; Kelven Yang;
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10045/#review18304
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jessica Tomechak
On March 22, 2013, 4:38 a.m
Hi Chip,
Yes, it applies cleanly on top of 4.1, compiles, and I tested it out to ensure
that the baremetal options/APIs aren't available post these changes. The
previous patch I uploaded actually applied cleanly in my workspace, so I
explicitly asked for whether the patch applied cleanly or not
Oh, Thanks.. but I can't find where default tty linux is preinstalled.
Also, if the ping from SSVM to my laptop is working, why am I still seeing
nfs://server:path Alert State Not found
on my Dashboard? It means something is still wrong?
Kausal Malladi
www.kausalmalladi.tk
On
Hi Alena,
Thanks for the FS.
I was going through the FS, is InternalLBVM is a new system VM?A new system
VM template will be there of the same VPCVR/VR template is used.
Am making changes such that at Traffic to Web tier is balanced by NetScaler on
the public side.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
> --
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
