I will help you resolve the conflicts.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Koushik Das wrote:
I tried a merge just now and it failed for tools/appliance/build.sh
On 09-Dec-2014, at 11:23 AM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote:
> Sounds good - thanks
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Rajani Karuturi > wr
I tried a merge just now and it failed for tools/appliance/build.sh
On 09-Dec-2014, at 11:23 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Sounds good - thanks
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
>
>> yes
>>
>> ~Rajani
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.
Sounds good - thanks
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> yes
>
> ~Rajani
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > So, in this case, the process would be to check the code into 4.5 and
> then
> > do an empty merge to
yes
~Rajani
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> So, in this case, the process would be to check the code into 4.5 and then
> do an empty merge to master? Is that correct?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Rajani Karuturi
> wrote
So, in this case, the process would be to check the code into 4.5 and then
do an empty merge to master? Is that correct?
Thanks
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> if you do an empty merge with that commit (-s ours), it would take care of
> it and will not come back in the
if you do an empty merge with that commit (-s ours), it would take care of
it and will not come back in the next merges.
~Rajani
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Have we ever decided what to do when people check code into, say, 4.5 and
> i
Have we ever decided what to do when people check code into, say, 4.5 and
it is not supposed to go into master?
Merging everything from 4.5 to master is not always desired.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> 4.5 is merged to master as of
> commit 701199fca726c68b4fc09ec893
4.5 is merged to master as of
commit 701199fca726c68b4fc09ec8939b4822e527e8c7
I hope few more would try merging, now that the conflicts are resolved.
~Rajani
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> last attempt was a failure with travis failures before and after the pull
> re
last attempt was a failure with travis failures before and after the pull
requests and hence abandoned the merge. Now that travis is green, I
planning to put up another pull request.
let me know if you see any issues.
~Rajani