Thanks for the info David, I'll keep it in mind. The force is pulling
cloudstack to the github-side strong at the moment. I thought of gitlabs as
the closest, easiest, cheapest alternative but am open to any. I'll find
time to have a look at those pointers.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:08 AM, David N
I've seen some of the conversations on dev@cloudstack- but I'll
respond in both lists.
We've had requests for Gitlab, Gerrit, and a few others.
Sometimes (including our own PMC) we've had requests for several
different, somewhat competing solutions for the same project.
We aren't shutting the doo
This has been discussed rather intensively on the infra ML previously.
Here's an answer from David: http://markmail.org/message/msxi7bhkfijydckq
It's about half years old, so "short term" might have changed.
--
Erik
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Wido, you are touchin
Wido, you are touching on the point of governance there. The maintenance is
the price for keeping the goods under your control. Apache wants to make
sure force pushes are not garbage collected but tagged for audit purposes,
I understand. Btw, let's include infra in the discussion.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2
On 08-01-16 09:25, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> We, cloudstack-dev-list-users have been talking about moving more
> functionality to github. This is being rejected by the foundation so far
> for (in my view obvious) reasons of governance. The functionality is
> however missed dearly so speaking with an
We, cloudstack-dev-list-users have been talking about moving more
functionality to github. This is being rejected by the foundation so far
for (in my view obvious) reasons of governance. The functionality is
however missed dearly so speaking with an ex-member he suggested we install
a machine with
