Re: analysis.apache.org

2015-05-21 Thread Daan Hoogland
black magic Op do 21 mei 2015 om 17:16 schreef David Nalley : > Wow - you made quite a bit of progress there. :) > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > 1291 got magically reduced to 192 on refresh. :) > > > > Op do 21 mei 2015 om 09:11 schreef Daan Hoogland < > daan.hoog

Re: analysis.apache.org

2015-05-21 Thread David Nalley
Wow - you made quite a bit of progress there. :) On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > 1291 got magically reduced to 192 on refresh. :) > > Op do 21 mei 2015 om 09:11 schreef Daan Hoogland : > >> There are five left :) they are all alike the one Laszlo fixed but as it >> concern

Re: analysis.apache.org

2015-05-21 Thread Daan Hoogland
1291 got magically reduced to 192 on refresh. :) Op do 21 mei 2015 om 09:11 schreef Daan Hoogland : > There are five left :) they are all alike the one Laszlo fixed but as it > concerned a string being cast into a map and the string may have different > formats I made seperate tickets for them. I

Re: analysis.apache.org

2015-05-21 Thread Daan Hoogland
There are five left :) they are all alike the one Laszlo fixed but as it concerned a string being cast into a map and the string may have different formats I made seperate tickets for them. I am next going to weed through the 1291 criticals, time permitting. Op wo 20 mei 2015 om 14:42 schreef Daan

Re: analysis.apache.org

2015-05-20 Thread Daan Hoogland
thanks guys and girl, I saw you fixed a similar issue in the api Laszlo. I couldn't quite translate it to the one I looked at. I will start creating issues for the old ones. They are indeed mostly more then 3 years old. Merged your pr, Rajani Op wo 20 mei 2015 om 13:51 schreef Rajani Karuturi :

Re: analysis.apache.org

2015-05-20 Thread Rajani Karuturi
I fixed js issues in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/269 ~Rajani On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > H fellow devs, > > > > It has come to my attentions that after more then eight months the sonar > > inst

Re: analysis.apache.org

2015-05-19 Thread Erik Weber
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H fellow devs, > > It has come to my attentions that after more then eight months the sonar > install at apache now does a daily analysis of cloudstack again.:) There > are 26 issues stamped 'Blocker' and a lot more fun in the lower categori

Re: analysis.apache.org

2015-05-19 Thread Laszlo Hornyak
I believe the problem was that sonar was outdated and the code analysis plugins could not handle some java 1.7 syntax (like resource blocks). With 5.1 even java 1.8 should not be a problem. The 26 new are actually the old ones plus the javascript, javascript was not analysed so far. And hmmm... on

analysis.apache.org

2015-05-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
H fellow devs, It has come to my attentions that after more then eight months the sonar install at apache now does a daily analysis of cloudstack again.:) There are 26 issues stamped 'Blocker' and a lot more fun in the lower categories. Shal I make issues per sonar 'Blocker'? I propose to make th