Oh, and to be clear, I don't think anyone is criticizing Animesh's efforts.
He does a great job of keeping track of defect trends and informing the
community.
Let me provide an example for how we did this at HP/LeftHand, which is
where I worked on a clustered SAN technology for seven years before
>>
>> The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes
>> indicated with a "*" next to their name:
>>
>> +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove Ewerlid
>> -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller
>>
>
> FWIW, I am very disappointed by this vote. The result
>From my point of view, it's hard to 'buy off' on something that has
such a large scope. In the past I've been skiddish to cast a vote,
knowing that I've only tested the things I'm familiar with and I may
very well be casting a +1 for something completely broken. The irony
is that I don't think a
Yep, I agree it's a tight schedule. Whether or not that's a good idea is
beside the point, I suppose.
I also agree some last-minute changes will come in. I was simply pointing
out that I have never encountered over 200 fixes coming into a release in
the final couple weeks. On a project where regre
The process is laid out. There's exactly 2 months of testing/bug fixing.
Given that schedule it isn't unreasonable that there are last minute
fixes.
Since the release manager is not an expert on any one feature,
he/she cannot judge which fixes should/shouldn't make it into the release.
The RM onl
Sebastien,
I could/would have voted +0 as I don't have a clear picture of the
quality of the release.
this once again comes down to testing in 72 hour and automating it.
Daan
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> I am changing the subject of the [RESULTS] thread for the
Hi Sebastien,
Personally I felt like I just didn't yet understand our testing/QA process
enough to know if 4.2 was ready or not.
I did voice concerns over the past few weeks regarding the number of
checkins that took place right before a RC was built (since I have never on
any product I've worked
I am changing the subject of the [RESULTS] thread for the 4.2 release.
On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
>
>
> The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated
> with a "*" next to their name:
>
> +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasan
