On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:32:33AM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> I can think of a use case where the user wants static Ips, but with
> range/overlap/reuse checks.
+1, although perhaps the tracking of IPs could be optional? Would it be
worth breaking out IPAM as a "service" provided to networks
I can think of a use case where the user wants static Ips, but with
range/overlap/reuse checks.
On 7/11/13 4:41 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>On 11/07/13 2:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In order to creat
Hello Murali,
Thanks for your input. I have submitted a patch to remove this test.
Regards,
Girish
On 11-Jul-2013, at 4:41 PM, Murali Reddy wrote:
> On 11/07/13 2:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In o
On 11/07/13 2:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are
>> required. I am looking at an old test case which creates shared
>> network without IP range
>
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are
> required. I am looking at an old test case which creates shared
> network without IP range
> and deploys vm in it. It of course fails as IP range is
Hello,
In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are required. I
am looking at an old test case which creates shared network without IP range
and deploys vm in it. It of course fails as IP range is required while creating
shared network.
Has anything related to shared netw
