Hello Murali,

Thanks for your input. I have submitted a patch to remove this test.

Regards,
Girish
On 11-Jul-2013, at 4:41 PM, Murali Reddy <murali.re...@citrix.com> wrote:

> On 11/07/13 2:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are
>>> required. I am looking at an old test case which creates shared
>>> network without IP range
>>> and deploys vm in it. It of course fails as IP range is required
>>> while creating shared network.
>> 
>>> Has anything related to shared network changed in recent times or
>>> the test case is just invalid ?
>> 
>> The steps of the test are as follows. If anyone has tested this
>> scenario and/or know how this works, your input would help resolve the
>> failure in automated tests:
> 
> I am not aware of the history (2.2.x releases) but current behaviour is
> you can not create a network without IP range being specified. For now
> mark this test as invalid or make expected behaviour is to fail network
> creation.
> 
> Having said that, we can create network offering and network without any
> network services (including DHCP, DNS). Without IPAM/DNS/DHCP services, IP
> range for the network has no relevance to CloudStack. So, in my opinion
> current behaviour is not right when network offering has no services,
> unless there is a reason for such enforcement. Opened CLOUDSTACK-3474 for
> further investigation.
> 
>> 
>> If not, I'll remove this test as invalid.
>> 
>> # 1. create a shared network using shared network offering but do not
>> specify startIp/endIp arguments
>> # 2. create an account
>> # 3. deploy a VM in this account using the above network
>> 
>> # Validate the following
>> # 1. listNetworks should return the created network
>> # 2. listAccounts to return the created account
>> # 3. VM deployment should succeed and NIC is in networks address space
>> # 4. delete the account
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Prasanna.,
>> 
>> ------------------------
>> Powered by BigRock.com
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to