Re: Review Request: Re-enable baremetal components

2013-04-18 Thread David Nalley
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Parth Jagirdar wrote: > I think original consensus was to disable Baremetal for 4.1 only. > > ŠParth If my earlier message wasn't clear enough, please consider this my veto on baremetal being enabled without tests coming in around it. --David

Re: Review Request: Re-enable baremetal components

2013-04-18 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 03:22:51AM +, Parth Jagirdar wrote: > I think original consensus was to disable Baremetal for 4.1 only. Correct, due to the quality issues with the feature and some (probably well deserved) vacation time requiring that we disable it. Now's a good time to ask about au

Re: Review Request: Re-enable baremetal components

2013-04-18 Thread Parth Jagirdar
I think original consensus was to disable Baremetal for 4.1 only. ŠParth On 4/18/13 6:56 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > >--- >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >https://reviews.apache.org/r/10616/#review19428 >--

Re: Review Request: Re-enable baremetal components

2013-04-18 Thread David Nalley
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10616/#review19428 --- Baremetal seems to be suffering from a significant lack of unit test

Review Request: Re-enable baremetal components

2013-04-18 Thread Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10616/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Kelven Yang, and Frank Zhang. Des