I think original consensus was to disable Baremetal for 4.1 only. ŠParth
On 4/18/13 6:56 PM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >----------------------------------------------------------- >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >https://reviews.apache.org/r/10616/#review19428 >----------------------------------------------------------- > > >Baremetal seems to be suffering from a significant lack of unit tests and >integration tests for marvin to consume. Let's get those in place before >we consider re-enabling this. > >- David Nalley > > >On April 19, 2013, 1:33 a.m., Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote: >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10616/ >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> >> (Updated April 19, 2013, 1:33 a.m.) >> >> >> Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Kelven Yang, and Frank >>Zhang. >> >> >> Description >> ------- >> >> Baremetal provisioning components were commented out on master - >>uncommenting them again to allow creation of baremetal clusters. >> >> >> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2101. >> >> >> Diffs >> ----- >> >> client/tomcatconf/applicationContext.xml.in 7487a5e >> client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in 7a46981 >> client/tomcatconf/nonossComponentContext.xml.in 2359ba8 >> >> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10616/diff/ >> >> >> Testing >> ------- >> >> Creation of a cluster of hypervisor type baremetal succeeds with these >>changes in. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati >> >> >
