Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> Yes. I¹ll create an annotation
>
> Kelven
>
> On 6/11/14, 9:59 AM, "Mike Tutkowski"
> wrote:
>
> >Yeah, and when a tool like Eclipse says a private variable is not in use,
> >I
> >can easily see someone removing it.
> >
> >So, does
Yes. I¹ll create an annotation
Kelven
On 6/11/14, 9:59 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote:
>Yeah, and when a tool like Eclipse says a private variable is not in use,
>I
>can easily see someone removing it.
>
>So, does that mean you will create such an annotation, Kelven? :)
>
>
>On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at
Yeah, and when a tool like Eclipse says a private variable is not in use, I
can easily see someone removing it.
So, does that mean you will create such an annotation, Kelven? :)
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Kelven Yang
wrote:
> I guess we can create one. Currently available annotations th
I guess we can create one. Currently available annotations that are to be
applied to java code are as following
* @Override
* @Deprecated
* @SuppressWarnings
* @SafeVarargs(since Java 7)
* @FunctionalInterface(since Java 8)
Calling functions through reflection is not a common way for static typi
I am not aware of any existing annotation for that purpose (not that that
means it doesn't necessary exist).
Kelven - Do you know of one? If not, would you be willing to create one?
Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> is there one availible or are we implementing @
is there one availible or are we implementing @usedPrivate ?
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Good idea
>
> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Kelven Yang wrote:
>
>> Maybe utilizing special java annotation would get developer heads-up?
>> Content in comments text is easily skipp
Good idea
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Kelven Yang wrote:
> Maybe utilizing special java annotation would get developer heads-up?
> Content in comments text is easily skipped as it is not usually considered
> as mandatory language constructs
>
> Kelven
>
> On 6/10/14, 4:25 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
>
Maybe utilizing special java annotation would get developer heads-up?
Content in comments text is easily skipped as it is not usually considered
as mandatory language constructs
Kelven
On 6/10/14, 4:25 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote:
>I haven't looked, but perhaps we should provide sufficient co
I haven't looked, but perhaps we should provide sufficient comments in each
of these cases so no one removes the fields thinking that they are old and
no longer in use.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> The usage of these private methods are through reflection, making it
> p
The usage of these private methods are through reflection, making it
private is to avoid exposing unnecessary internal structures to outside.
Kelven
On 6/10/14, 2:46 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
>Hi Kelven,
>while fixing some of the issues reported by coverity I encountered some
>unused private
10 matches
Mail list logo
