Re: Shared networks without IP range.

2013-07-15 Thread Chip Childers
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:32:33AM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I can think of a use case where the user wants static Ips, but with > range/overlap/reuse checks. +1, although perhaps the tracking of IPs could be optional? Would it be worth breaking out IPAM as a "service" provided to networks

Re: Shared networks without IP range.

2013-07-14 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
I can think of a use case where the user wants static Ips, but with range/overlap/reuse checks. On 7/11/13 4:41 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >On 11/07/13 2:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: > >>On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> In order to creat

Re: Shared networks without IP range.

2013-07-11 Thread Girish Shilamkar
Hello Murali, Thanks for your input. I have submitted a patch to remove this test. Regards, Girish On 11-Jul-2013, at 4:41 PM, Murali Reddy wrote: > On 11/07/13 2:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> In o

Re: Shared networks without IP range.

2013-07-11 Thread Murali Reddy
On 11/07/13 2:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: >> Hello, >> >> In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are >> required. I am looking at an old test case which creates shared >> network without IP range >

Re: Shared networks without IP range.

2013-07-11 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:27:28PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > Hello, > > In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are > required. I am looking at an old test case which creates shared > network without IP range > and deploys vm in it. It of course fails as IP range is