On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:46:36PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> In reviewing the 4.2 object store enhancements, object stores are defined
> with region scope. However, there is no way to assign an object store
> definition to a region. To my way of thinking, we must be able to assign
Well, you can add / list the other regions. I'm still trying to get my
head around why, but honestly I think it's more of a future looking
thing.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:39:14PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> Chip,
>
> Why do we have a region entity in the database if everything is assumed to b
Chip,
Why do we have a region entity in the database if everything is assumed to be
one and only region?
Thanks,
-John
On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Burwell wrote:
>
>> Chip,
>>
>> So two regions won't share the same database?
>>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Burwell wrote:
> Chip,
>
> So two regions won't share the same database?
>
Nope, that's why you have to use something (not provided yet) to sync the
acct / domain metadata between them.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Chip Childers
>
Chip,
So two regions won't share the same database?
Thanks,
-John
On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:46:36PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> In reviewing the 4.2 object store enhancements, object stores are defined
>> with region scope. H
