On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Burwell <jburw...@basho.com> wrote:
> Chip, > > So two regions won't share the same database? > Nope, that's why you have to use something (not provided yet) to sync the acct / domain metadata between them. > > Thanks, > -John > > On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:46:36PM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > >> All, > >> > >> In reviewing the 4.2 object store enhancements, object stores are > defined with region scope. However, there is no way to assign an object > store definition to a region. To my way of thinking, we must be able to > assign an object store to a region to avoid transfer of large assets across > WAN links. Furthermore, it greatly reduces availability of the object > store cluster because the management server/ssvm may attempt to connect to > an object store over a WAN link when co-located instance is available. Why > isn't assignment of an object store to a region supported? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -John > > > > AFAIK, a management server is only a control point for a single region. > > The Region entity is used to provide users with a reference to other > > regions that may be part of the same service. If I'm right, then the > > locally configured object-store would be for that region only. > > > > Other feel free to correct me. > > >
