Sounds dangerous, hope you get home with a good tale.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:32 AM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 1/17/22 4:28 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> > Hi Wido,
> >
> > CloudStack allows users to add multiple IP ranges to a shared network.
> All
> > these IPs share the same vlan. I hope i
On 1/17/22 4:28 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> CloudStack allows users to add multiple IP ranges to a shared network. All
> these IPs share the same vlan. I hope it helps you.
>
Yes, but then they would also be allocated to VMs.
> The problem is, a secondary IP can only be assigned to a
Op 17-01-2022 om 15:07 schreef Daan Hoogland:
Wido,
As an operator, would I sell a floating ip with a number of instances it
can be applied to?
For example you would sell a /32 and /128 address (or a larger subnet)
which a client can announce from their VMs.
It does require that the upstr
Hi Wido,
CloudStack allows users to add multiple IP ranges to a shared network. All
these IPs share the same vlan. I hope it helps you.
The problem is, a secondary IP can only be assigned to a VM. I think we can
add a flag like `floating` to secondary IP . If the flag is true, it can be
assigned
Wido,
As an operator, would I sell a floating ip with a number of instances it
can be applied to?
just checking on your envisioned business case, not implying an answer
here/yet.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 2:37 PM Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Use-case: I have a SG enabled shared network wher
at how other
> projects are solving this problem, maybe explore other RPC frameworks such
> as gRPC.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Marcus
> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 22:36
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: KVM Agent disconnect ho
dern approach would be to look at how other projects
are solving this problem, maybe explore other RPC frameworks such as gRPC.
Regards.
From: Marcus
Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 22:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: KVM Agent disconnect hooks
Thanks, Daan, I appreciate the feedback and I hope it is useful. I wish I
could comment more on the other hypervisors and how something similar might
work for them.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:49 AM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> thanks Marcus,
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 7:32 PM Marcus wrote:
>
> > Hi ev
thanks Marcus,
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 7:32 PM Marcus wrote:
> Hi everyone! It's been awhile. I've got a feature I'd love to get some
> feedback on and contribute to the community, if it's acceptable. I need to
> brush up on the proper process (did read CONTRIBUTING.md).
Not a lot has changed.
You can't, Advanced zone has to use some isolation method, and that is VLAN
by default. Please read the documentation thoroughly, in order to
understand the possibilities and limitations.
Best,
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 13:05, Al Amin
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I setup KVM Advanced zone without vLAN,
On 9/5/19 6:03 PM, Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT) wrote:
>
>>> Wido, makes sense that log4j and logrotate would conflict. Log4j
>>> has its
>>> own rotate functionality.
>>
>
> Note that a few CS log files are not generated by log4j.
> You still need external logrotatation if you don't want them to
> > Wido, makes sense that log4j and logrotate would conflict. Log4j
> > has its
> > own rotate functionality.
>
Note that a few CS log files are not generated by log4j.
You still need external logrotatation if you don't want them to fill up
your disk.
I had this issue with access.log, for exam
On 9/5/19 11:13 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Wido, makes sense that log4j and logrotate would conflict. Log4j has its
> own rotate functionality.
It does indeed :-)
> I didn't understand before but the binary data is always the beginning of
> the file? Is always nulls?
I found this out yesterda
Wido, makes sense that log4j and logrotate would conflict. Log4j has its
own rotate functionality.
I didn't understand before but the binary data is always the beginning of
the file? Is always nulls?
Op do 5 sep. 2019 09:18 schreef Wei ZHOU :
> Hi Wido,
>
> I saw this issue in a 4.11.3 platform t
Hi Wido,
I saw this issue in a 4.11.3 platform today.
It seems to be caused by file
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/agent/conf/cloudstack-agent.logrotate.in
Maybe the file /etc/logrotate.d/cloudstack-agent is not needed ( in Ubuntu
?).
-Wei
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 08:08, Wido
On 9/3/19 2:55 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:22 PM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 9/3/19 9:57 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>> Can you find/look at the line before in the log. It is probably the one
>>> containing the hindering data. Or otherwise it *might* be a clue
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:22 PM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 9/3/19 9:57 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > Can you find/look at the line before in the log. It is probably the one
> > containing the hindering data. Or otherwise it *might* be a clue where in
> > the flow it happens.
> >
>
> Do you
On 9/3/19 9:57 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Can you find/look at the line before in the log. It is probably the one
> containing the hindering data. Or otherwise it *might* be a clue where in
> the flow it happens.
>
Do you have any idea what the easiest way might be?
I checked agent.log.1.gz a
Can you find/look at the line before in the log. It is probably the one
containing the hindering data. Or otherwise it *might* be a clue where in
the flow it happens.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:22 AM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 9/2/19 10:18 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> > Hi Wido,
> >
> > I had sim
bin1kKK_RS4uR.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
Hi Wido,
I had similar issue (not agent.log). It is probably caused by one or few
lines with special characters.
"grep -a" should work.
-Wei
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 19:35, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen this on multiple occasions with Ubuntu 18.04 (and maybe
> 16.04?) hypervisors
his?
>
> 发件人: Nicolas Vazquez<mailto:nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com>
> 发送时间: 2019年6月23日 23:31
> 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>;
> users<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> 抄送: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack
domingo, 23 de junio 11:03
Asunto: Re: KVM HA fails under multiple management services
Para: users
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Li,
based on the Global Setting description for those 2, I would say that is
the expected behaviour.
i.e. change Indirect.agent.lb.check.interval to some other value,
Li,
based on the Global Setting description for those 2, I would say that is
the expected behaviour.
i.e. change Indirect.agent.lb.check.interval to some other value, since 0
means "don't check, don't reconnect" per what I read.
Also, you might want to change from Indirect.agent.lb.algorithm=sta
Fixing that is not back compatible because SOs can be created aligned to
TurboBoost values. Adding global variable switch can be an option.
пт, 28 дек. 2018 г., 7:38 Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com:
> I agree Wido, it's just that it's wrong - there should be no implicit CPU
> over-provision
I agree Wido, it's just that it's wrong - there should be no implicit CPU
over-provisioning by default - and yes, later you can do over-provision by
2-3 as most of us do...
just something that hurts my eyes :)
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 at 11:39, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 12/28/18 9:23 AM, And
On 12/28/18 9:23 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/29e389eb872ffa816be99aa66ff20bdec56d3187
>
> this one gets above gets CPU frequency with "effectively
> "cat sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq" which gives the
> TurboBoost C
gt;
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On 11/8/18 11:20 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
>> > >>>> I think these is legacy and a guess back in the day. It was 50
>> > at one
>> > >>> point and
1/8/18 11:20 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
> > >>>> I think these is legacy and a guess back in the day. It was 50
> > at one
> > >>> point and it was lifted higher a few releases. ago.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I see. I'm about to do a test wi
m about to do a test with a bunch of 128GB hypervisors and
> >>> spawning a lot of 128M VMs. Trying to see where the limit might
> be and
> >>> also stress the VR a bit by loading a lot of DHCP entries.
> >>>
> >>> Wido
>
higher a few releases. ago.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I see. I'm about to do a test with a bunch of 128GB hypervisors and
> >>> spawning a lot of 128M VMs. Trying to see where the limit might be and
> >>> also stress the VR a bit by loading a
;> point and it was lifted higher a few releases. ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I see. I'm about to do a test with a bunch of 128GB hypervisors and
>>>>> spawning a lot of 128M VMs. Trying to see where the limit might be and
>>>
h of 128GB hypervisors and
> >>> spawning a lot of 128M VMs. Trying to see where the limit might be and
> >>> also stress the VR a bit by loading a lot of DHCP entries.
> >>>
> >>> Wido
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> &
gt; also stress the VR a bit by loading a lot of DHCP entries.
>>>
>>> Wido
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
gt; >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
> > > To: dev
> > > Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit
> > >
> > > Hi all, +1 for higher numbers.
>
> > From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
> > Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit
> >
> > Hi all, +1 for higher numbers.
> >
> > чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:32, Wido den Hollander :
see where the limit might be and
also stress the VR a bit by loading a lot of DHCP entries.
Wido
>
>
>
>
> From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit
>
> Hi all, +1
ago.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit
>
> Hi all, +1 for higher numbers.
>
> чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:32, Wido den Hollander :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see that for
I think these is legacy and a guess back in the day. It was 50 at one point and
it was lifted higher a few releases. ago.
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit
Hi all, +1 for higher numbers
Hi all, +1 for higher numbers.
чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:32, Wido den Hollander :
> Hi,
>
> I see that for KVM we set the limit to 144 guests by default, can
> anybody tell me why we have this limit set to 144?
>
> Searching a bit I found this:
> https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-kvm-limits
Cool. Thanks for the explanation Ivan, I'll watch with interest.
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
Sent: 23 October 2018 14:55
To: dev
Subject: Re: KVM Cloud
Wido,
> How are you planning on getting things like the VM name and other
details to the scripts?
Agent passes it right now into SGs, so I'm thinking about the same way:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/65f31f1a9fbc1c20cd752d80a7e1117efc0248a5/plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/main/java/com/cl
ike you want to build upon this rather than
> rewrite it.
>
>
>
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander
> Sent: 23
House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: 23 October 2018 07:46
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: KVM CloudStack Agent Hacking proposal
On 10/22/18 8:02 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote:
> Hello, Devs.
>
>
On 10/22/18 8:02 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote:
> Hello, Devs.
>
> I would like to introduce a feature and decided to consult with you about
> its design before implementation. The feature is connected with KVM
> CloudStack agent. We have found it beneficial to be able to launch custom
> scripts u
Hi,
Ive added more hosts and enabled ha on all of them. Now i shoot down
node cs-hv-06, which is running r-199. Here
are the logs iam gettin.
--
2018-08-13 12:12:51,402 DEBUG [c.c.h.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(pool-5-thread-1:null) (logid:b71a09c7) Notifying HA Mgr of to restart
vm 199-r-199-VM
In my experience,
/etc/init/libvirt-bin.conf is used for ubuntu 12.04 (add "-d -l", any
change in /etc/default/libvirt-bin has no impact)
/etc/default/libvirt-bin is used for ubuntu 16.04. We use -l . "-d" will
cause libvirt-bin fails to restart. If libvirt-bin fails to restart, please
execute "sy
com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman [mailto:oruzgarkara...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 January 2018 09:05
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: KVM on ubuntu
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Wido den Hollander wr
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 01/16/2018 06:36 AM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul;
>> Ubuntu 16.04 has systemd installed and it directly controls libvirtd
>> process so if you add -d to /etc/default/libvirt-bin file libvirtd tries
>> to
>> control
On 01/16/2018 06:36 AM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman wrote:
Hi Paul;
Ubuntu 16.04 has systemd installed and it directly controls libvirtd
process so if you add -d to /etc/default/libvirt-bin file libvirtd tries to
control to its self and then you have problem, you could not
stop/start/restart libvirtd
Hi Paul;
Ubuntu 16.04 has systemd installed and it directly controls libvirtd
process so if you add -d to /etc/default/libvirt-bin file libvirtd tries to
control to its self and then you have problem, you could not
stop/start/restart libvirtd service via systemd. Only adding -l flag to
libvirtd_opt
Hi, community.
I implemented quick PR for KVM cloudstack-agent with use of
additional directive host.overcommit.mem.mb at agent.properties
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2266
I tested it in my 4.9, works nic for me. Also, during the building I found
interesting bug in Quota plugin, pr
> Op 12 september 2017 om 9:05 schreef Ivan Kudryavtsev
> :
>
>
> Yes, sure.
>
> What I want is an ability to increase host memory rather than decrease it.
>
> So the first suggestion is to add a parameter to increase amount of
> megabytes or gigabytes, not necessary a multiplier. Manual addi
Yes, sure.
What I want is an ability to increase host memory rather than decrease it.
So the first suggestion is to add a parameter to increase amount of
megabytes or gigabytes, not necessary a multiplier. Manual adding via
agent.properties is a good way to implement it because different hosts ca
> Op 11 september 2017 om 13:04 schreef Ivan Kudryavtsev
> :
>
>
> Hi, Wido.
>
> Yes, you can. But it works not the way I expect because It cuts RAM from VM
> by dividing it to overprovisioning factor like VM with 2GB of RAM with
> Overprovisioning factor 2.0 will get 1GB displayed with "free"
Hi, Wido.
Yes, you can. But it works not the way I expect because It cuts RAM from VM
by dividing it to overprovisioning factor like VM with 2GB of RAM with
Overprovisioning factor 2.0 will get 1GB displayed with "free" command.
That's why I finished the message with words that it might be I just
Hi,
> Op 10 september 2017 om 8:37 schreef Ivan Kudryavtsev
> :
>
>
> Hello, community.
>
> During the last years Linux kernel got some interesting features like KSM,
> ZSWAP, ZRAM. Hardware also steps forward and we see Intel 3d xpoint,
> extremely fast SSD drives with m.2 and PCI-E interface
Yeah. I'm on Ubuntu 14.04 at the moment.
*Jeff Hair*
Technical Lead and Software Developer
Tel: (+354) 415 0200
j...@greenqloud.com
www.greenqloud.com
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
>
> It depends on what base distro/OS you're using to build CloudStack. I'm
> u
Hi Jeff,
It depends on what base distro/OS you're using to build CloudStack. I'm using
Ubuntu 16.04 and CentOS7 (latest) and I did not get errors while building
latest master. Though, I see Travis related failures around few unit tests in
cloud-server.
If you're using Ubuntu 12.04/14.04 or o
document bug, I think.
Ubuntu 12.04 works fine in my testing.
2016-06-20 12:24 GMT+02:00 Paul Angus :
> Hi All,
>
> Our documentation states that the following are required:
>
> * libvirt: 1.2.0 or higher
> * Qemu/KVM: 2.0 or higher
>
> CentOS6 does not include these versions
> CentOS7
> Op 6 februari 2016 om 13:01 schreef Indra Pramana :
>
>
> Hi Wido,
>
> Good day to you, and thanks for your reply. Nice to hear from you again. :)
>
> So is this caused by a bug on 4.2 which is resolved on newer version of
> ACS? Any specific information on the bug, e.g. bug ID and descripti
Hi Wido and all,
Good day to you.
In addition to my previous email, I noted that the latest released version
of ACS is 4.7. May I know if the problem is resolved by 4.7? I don't
think 4.8 is already available from ACS repository, unless if we get the
source and compile ourselves.
https://cloudst
Hi Wido,
Good day to you, and thanks for your reply. Nice to hear from you again. :)
So is this caused by a bug on 4.2 which is resolved on newer version of
ACS? Any specific information on the bug, e.g. bug ID and description on
how to fix it? Is there a way I can resolve the problem without hav
Hi,
> Op 5 februari 2016 om 17:24 schreef Indra Pramana :
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> We are using CloudStack 4.2.0, KVM hypervisor and Ceph RBD for primary
> storage. In the past one week, many of our KVM host agents would often be
> disconnected from the management server, causing the VMs to go down
Thanks Wido,
Let's see what the others think of it.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Wido den Hollander"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 January, 2016 16:30:57
>
adrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Wido den Hollander"
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 January, 2016 15:37:39
>> Subject: Re: KVM: Security grouping through libvirt instead of Python
e.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 January, 2016 15:37:39
> Subject: Re: KVM: Security grouping through libvirt instead of Python
> On 06-01-16 16:20, Nux! wrote:
>> That's great! Fine by me then, but we need to be careful and not mess up the
>> SG
>> bits for XenServer.
>
udstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 January, 2016 14:38:17
>> Subject: Re: KVM: Security grouping through libvirt instead of Python
>
>> On 06-01-16 13:12, Nux! wrote:
>>> Hi Wido,
>>>
>>> +1 for using more libvirt and less custom stuff, but what d
den Hollander"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 January, 2016 14:38:17
> Subject: Re: KVM: Security grouping through libvirt instead of Python
> On 06-01-16 13:12, Nux! wrote:
>> Hi Wido,
>>
>> +1 for using more libvirt and less custom stuff, but w
On 06-01-16 13:12, Nux! wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> +1 for using more libvirt and less custom stuff, but what do we do about
> XenServer? SG is supported with it as well and there is no libvirt there.
> Would this be a different implementation just for KVM?
>
Yes. For KVM we control almost everythi
Hi Wido,
+1 for using more libvirt and less custom stuff, but what do we do about
XenServer? SG is supported with it as well and there is no libvirt there.
Would this be a different implementation just for KVM?
In addition, I have the following in production and it's not clear if it would
conti
Qian,
This is fixed in 4.6/master by
commit bef92052ee9a7303b427782838a8a97623de231c
diff --git
a/engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/VolumeDataFactoryImpl.java
b/engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/VolumeDataFactoryImp~
index bc51f5f..3e4cdff
On 11/18/2015 08:23 AM, Qian Shaohua wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> CS 4.5.2 KVM
>
> KVMStorageProcessor checks source volume of a snapshot for the ImageFormat
> in createVolumeFromSnapshot(CopyCommand cmd).
>
> If the source volume is deleted, we get NPE.
>
>
>
> 2015-11-18 14:02:57,259 DEBU
> On 10 Oct 2015, at 12:35, Remi Bergsma wrote:
>
> Can you please explain what the issue is with KVM HA? In my tests, HA starts
> all VMs just fine without the hypervisor coming back. At least that is on
> current 4.6. Assuming a cluster of multiple nodes of course. It will then do
> a neigh
m: "Remi Bergsma"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: "Cloudstack Users List"
> Sent: Saturday, 10 October, 2015 11:35:36
> Subject: Re: KVM HA is broken, let's fix it
> Hi Lucian,
>
> Can you please explain what the issue is with KVM HA? In my test
Hi Lucian,
Can you please explain what the issue is with KVM HA? In my tests, HA starts
all VMs just fine without the hypervisor coming back. At least that is on
current 4.6. Assuming a cluster of multiple nodes of course. It will then do a
neighbor check from another host in the same cluster.
Thanks Wilder :)
> On 29-May-2015, at 9:18 am, Wilder Rodrigues
> wrote:
>
> That’s a bunch of emails within 10minutes. :)
>
> I checked the branch again and found out that not all the IPs have been
> replaced. It means that you commit on the 25th was fine.
>
> Will fix it now and merge.
>
> Ch
That’s a bunch of emails within 10minutes. :)
I checked the branch again and found out that not all the IPs have been
replaced. It means that you commit on the 25th was fine.
Will fix it now and merge.
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 29 May 2015, at 09:09, Wilder Rodrigues
> wrote:
>
> Hi there again,
Hi there again,
The file on master doesn’t contains my changes, as we already know:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/plugins/hypervisors/kvm/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResourceTest.java
If you check the history, the changes were gone 7 days ago, on th
Sorry, that’s the PR:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/270
Cheers,
Wilder
On 29 May 2015, at 09:03, Wilder Rodrigues
mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
It was indeed fixed on libvirt:
https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack/commit/982a0235a0143864e5b0eda1836fb913d9125
It was indeed fixed on libvirt:
https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack/commit/982a0235a0143864e5b0eda1836fb913d91252f6
and it was merged 9 days ago:
https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack/commit/982a0235a0143864e5b0eda1836fb913d91252f6
It seems another PR just got rid of my changes.
Sorry guys, I missed this email.
A couple of weeks ago I replaced many IPs by 127.0.0.1 in the tests. Missed
that one.
Haven’t ran into this issue - not local, remotely or seen any complain on ASF
builds. Reason for not reacting before.
Will fix.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 25 May 2015, at 16:01, Raf
I am getting the same in my environments, can't you put that
UnsatistfiedLinkError in a try/catch to let it not fail if the exception
isn't thrown? :)
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Wilder,
>
> In my environment, when building the kvm plugin on master branch I’m
> getti
This can be done by enabling HA in the service offering for an instance.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Budur Nagaraju"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 30 April, 2015 10:37:56
> Subject: KVM HA
> HI
goto boot menu to enable intel virtualisation...in newer intel motherboards
its under security in boot menu..
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Somesh Naidu
wrote:
> There may not be any specific KVM.HA configuration. What are you looking
> for?
>
> Somesh
> CloudPlatform Escalations
> Citrix Syst
There may not be any specific KVM.HA configuration. What are you looking for?
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Budur Nagaraju [mailto:nbud...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 5:38 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: KVM HA
H
+1
@Marcus: This is also something on my wish list :-)
@Nux: When we look at SELinux, we should also make it work with AppArmor
(Ubuntu). I think it should not be too hard to fix this for the KVM agent,
as both provide tools to record the permissions and create profiles. But
you never know what y
Good proposition.
Personally I would like to see support for Selinux and separation between VMs.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Marcus"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 24 April, 2015 00:17:09
> Subject
Remi,
We haven't experienced exactly what you're describing, but we did have a
similar issue that caused multiple interfaces to be built back when we upgraded
to 4.3 from 4.1.1 on KVM.
Have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6464.
The notes also reference another couple o
It is still doing the same, I suspect that this is an intentional behavior
of qemu, it keeps the disk space for future use. However I haven't found
any documentation on how users should free the space.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> As far as I know, KVM does support memory
t;
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 8 December, 2014 12:05:50
> Subject: Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)
> Hm... I see that in XS 6.0.2 it was impossible to do memory snapshot unless
> you had a licenced XS ? Is this still the case with XS 6.2 ?
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 12:4
Not that I know. I take VM snaphots all the time, and don't have XS
licenses.
--
Erik
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Hm... I see that in XS 6.0.2 it was impossible to do memory snapshot unless
> you had a licenced XS ? Is this still the case with XS 6.2 ?
>
> On 8 Decem
Hm... I see that in XS 6.0.2 it was impossible to do memory snapshot unless
you had a licenced XS ? Is this still the case with XS 6.2 ?
On 8 December 2014 at 12:43, Erik Weber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
> vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
> > wrote:
>
> > CS does not s
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:
> CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are
> working. Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I
> thought the reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not
> support memory sna
As far as I know, KVM does support memory snapshot.
The shortcoming is libvirt-java supports only internal snapshot (not
external snapshots) for now.
In this case, the memory snapshot will be attached to the qcow2 file, and
the qcow2 will grow even after we remove the memory snapshot.
I've changed
With KVM - I understand that there are 2 steps in general. 1) libvirts save
- which saves memory of running VM to a file 2) qemu-img to snapshot
disks...
AS for the KVM VM snapshoting - my understanding is that the code is not
implemented at all, right ?
On 8 December 2014 at 12:11, Vadim Kimlay
CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are working.
Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I thought the
reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not support memory
snapshots - I wonder wich hypervisor does it ? This option at user
Thanks, Wido
On Thursday, November 6, 2014, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 11/05/2014 10:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> > When you say the disk would be snapshotted, do you mean from the point of
> > view of the SAN or from the point of view of the hypervisor?
> >
>
> Hypervisor. QCOW2 files
On 11/05/2014 10:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> When you say the disk would be snapshotted, do you mean from the point of
> view of the SAN or from the point of view of the hypervisor?
>
Hypervisor. QCOW2 files support snapshots, so does RBD.
When using iSCSI we usually create a VG on top of t
When you say the disk would be snapshotted, do you mean from the point of
view of the SAN or from the point of view of the hypervisor?
A SAN snapshot is no problem. I'm mainly curious to see how this would work
for a hypervisor snapshot.
Thanks!
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Wido den Hollander
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
