+1, unless you host bunch of 64G and 128G VMs (like us), in that case even 50 is fine :)
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 23:20 Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.invalid wrote: > I think these is legacy and a guess back in the day. It was 50 at one > point and it was lifted higher a few releases. ago. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> > Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit > > Hi all, +1 for higher numbers. > > чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:32, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>: > > > Hi, > > > > I see that for KVM we set the limit to 144 guests by default, can > > anybody tell me why we have this limit set to 144? > > > > Searching a bit I found this: > > https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-kvm-limits > > > > "This guest limit does not apply to Red Hat Enterprise Linux with > > Unlimited Guests. There is no guest limit for Red Hat Enterprise > > Virtualization" > > > > There is always a limit somewhere, but why do we set it to 144? > > > > I would personally vote for increasing this to 500 or something so that > > users don't run into it that easily. > > > > Also, the log line is printed in DEBUG mode only when a host reaches > > this limit, so I created a PR to set this to INFO: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3013 > > > > Any input? > > > > Wido > > > > > -- > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev > Bitworks LLC > Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515 > Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512 > WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> >
