I've done some more work on the networking - it would be good if this
could be tested.
I'll leave the issue open until I get some feedback that it looks ok.
Please feel free to add other issues on github if you find other bugs.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Rajani Karuturi
wrote:
> oopss.. s
oopss.. sorry.. didn’t look at the issues list on github :)
I will work on the mount issue.
Thanks,
~Rajani
On 05-Feb-2014, at 3:16 pm, chris snow
mailto:chsnow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Rajani,
Many thanks for the feedback.
I still have to figure out the network setup - I have created an i
Hi Rajani,
Many thanks for the feedback.
I still have to figure out the network setup - I have created an issue
on github to track this.
There is also an open issue for the mount problem.
https://github.com/snowch/devcloud/issues?state=open
Please feel free to raise any other defects that you
Hi Chris,
I tried this today on my machine(macbook 7,1)
It took nearly 1 hr 45 min for packer build+downloads. Once that is done, when
i did a vagrant up, saw the following mount error
[default] -- /vagrant
Failed to mount folders in Linux guest. This is usually beacuse
the "vboxsf" file system i
The xapi issue is fixed now.
Next on the list:
- The mysql root passwordless access is broken.
- Add additional network card.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:16 PM, chris snow wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Sebastien, it's much appreciated.
>
> I'll investigate in more detail over the next few da
Thanks for the feedback Sebastien, it's much appreciated.
I'll investigate in more detail over the next few days...
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:25 PM, chris snow wrote:
>>
>>>
On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:25 PM, chris snow wrote:
>
>> I finally got the packer built devcloud box to boot with vagrant, but
>> running 'xe vm-list' in it results in:
>>
>> Error: Connection refused (calling connect )
>>
>> I'm going t
On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:25 PM, chris snow wrote:
> I finally got the packer built devcloud box to boot with vagrant, but
> running 'xe vm-list' in it results in:
>
> Error: Connection refused (calling connect )
>
> I'm going to do some more investigation, but could take a while as I
> get to le
I finally got the packer built devcloud box to boot with vagrant, but
running 'xe vm-list' in it results in:
Error: Connection refused (calling connect )
I'm going to do some more investigation, but could take a while as I
get to learn xen.
To make things easy while working on this I've created
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:57 PM, chris snow wrote:
>
>> I have started thinking about some options:
>>
>> 1) use packer to convert the devcloud2 veewee definition as a starting point
>> 2) create devcloud3 from scratch
>> 3) start with a
sorry didn't finish my last email - another late night...
it would be great to see devcloud support centos/ubuntu. After
getting the debian 7 based devcloud working with packer and vagrant
I'll take a look in more detail at your repo to see what makes sense
for the next steps.
Many thanks,
Chr
Thanks for the info Sebastien.
I have made a bit more progress with:
- fixing up the existing debian 7 veewee build [1]
- converting the fixed debian 7 veewee build to packer [2]
I'll focus on adding proper vagrant support over the next couple of days.
---
[1]
https://github.com/snowch/cloudst
On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:57 PM, chris snow wrote:
> I have started thinking about some options:
>
> 1) use packer to convert the devcloud2 veewee definition as a starting point
> 2) create devcloud3 from scratch
> 3) start with an existing packer definition (e.g. [1])
>
> Do you have a view on w
I have started thinking about some options:
1) use packer to convert the devcloud2 veewee definition as a starting point
2) create devcloud3 from scratch
3) start with an existing packer definition (e.g. [1])
Do you have a view on which option may be most suitable?
If we go with option 2 or 3,
On Jan 29, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Thanks for stepping in. That is much needed, in fact I think we should
> use something like packer alongwith vagrant/veewee for both devcloud
> and systemvmtemplate. Veewee can build vms, packer can export them to
> various platforms/formats and
Thanks for stepping in. That is much needed, in fact I think we should
use something like packer alongwith vagrant/veewee for both devcloud
and systemvmtemplate. Veewee can build vms, packer can export them to
various platforms/formats and a developer could use vagrant for local
devcloud/host autom
16 matches
Mail list logo
