Re: 4.9 Release Management

I need to talk to the other guys and start to work that out. We have to have at least one CI environment up and running that we can validate against before we will be able to have a clear timeline. This is a work in progress as we speak... *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solu

Re: 4.9 Release Management

[ShapeBlue] Abhinandan Prateek Software Architect , ShapeBlue d: | s: +44 203 603 0540 | m: +91 970 11 99011 e: abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com | t: | w: www.s

Re: 4.9 Release Management

Will, Samir, Koushik and Patrick, Thanks for your commitment and energy. Regards ilya On 3/2/16 11:43 AM, Samir Agarwal wrote: > Kudos Will! > > I had received many private notes wondering if Accelerite will continue to > play a strong role in contributions to the community; here is your proof

Re: 4.9 Release Management

People, I agree that CI is an important issue and I thank Will for taking owner ship. Will: Thank you. I will keep watching the builds.apache.org part of it and hammer on new or old :/s findbugs issues that come up. 4.9 and CI are not related directly. CI would be related to release process and no

Re: 4.9 Release Management

Thanks Will for initiating the discussion on 4.9 release management. As already mentioned, I along with Patrick will be helping out Will with the release process. Having a reliable CI system is very important going forward. There are discussions already happening in the list related to it. I ag

Re: 4.9 Release Management

; > figure out. I know the feeling. :) > > > > We probably need to have a concensus around release cadence and stick to > > it for a while. Otherwise we're going to lose some credibility as > project. > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Will Steven

Re: 4.9 Release Management

out. I know the feeling. :) >> >> We probably need to have a concensus around release cadence and stick to >> it for a while. Otherwise we're going to lose some credibility as project. >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Will Stevens >> Se

Re: 4.9 Release Management

can do to help. > > - Si > > > From: Paul Angus > Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 3:09 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: 4.9 Release Management > > That's good enough for me (tm). you're figurin

Re: 4.9 Release Management

> > From: Will Stevens > Sent: 2 Mar 2016 20:46 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: 4.9 Release Management > > I don't think I can answer that at this time. My personal opinion is that > CI is more important than the release timeline, but others may not s

Re: 4.9 Release Management

Will, You have our support! Let us know what we can do to help. - Si From: Paul Angus Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 3:09 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.9 Release Management That's good enough for me (tm). you're figuring ou

Re: 4.9 Release Management

ent: 2 Mar 2016 20:46 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.9 Release Management I don't think I can answer that at this time. My personal opinion is that CI is more important than the release timeline, but others may not share this opinion (as it is only my opinion). I am full s

Re: 4.9 Release Management

I don't think I can answer that at this time. My personal opinion is that CI is more important than the release timeline, but others may not share this opinion (as it is only my opinion). I am full steam ahead trying to review what we have in place and the work that different parties have done o

RE: 4.9 Release Management

Thanks for taking up the baton Will et al. Just for clarity - given that getting CI 'done' will take some time (mainly because of the state of the Marvin Tests and Marvin output) - are 'we' now dropping the monthly releases? [ShapeBlue] Paul Angus VP Technology ,

RE: 4.9 Release Management

Kudos Will! I had received many private notes wondering if Accelerite will continue to play a strong role in contributions to the community; here is your proof! We wanted to take on the biggest pain points in the community, and see how we can make positive contributions. Koushik Das will work a