Re: 4.6 release

>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Erik > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Nux! wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think we

Re: 4.6 release

>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Erik >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Nux! wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we do need to mention this i

Re: 4.6 release

>>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I think we do need to mention this in the notes, if people have the > >>>> "awsapi" package installed, they should remove it, or we should > gracefully > >>>> "obsolete" it from the RPM packaging. &g

Re: 4.6 release

te" it from the RPM packaging. >>>> >>>> I had to manually "rpm -e --nodeps cloudstack-awsapi" to avoid conflicts, >>>> but otherwise the upgrade went fine. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant usin

Re: 4.6 release

aging. >>> >>> I had to manually "rpm -e --nodeps cloudstack-awsapi" to avoid conflicts, >>> but otherwise the upgrade went fine. >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>> >>> Nux

Re: 4.6 release

pi" to avoid conflicts, >> but otherwise the upgrade went fine. >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> - Original Message - >> > From: "Sebastien Goasguen" >&g

Re: 4.6 release

gt;> built with? > >>>> > >>>> And actually is there any difference between /rhel and /centos ? > >>>> > >>> > >>> No, there is not. It's just a symlink. /rhel was the old path and > >>> /centos is the new one. > >>> > >>>>

Re: 4.6 release

ut otherwise the upgrade went fine. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Sebastien Goasguen" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "Remi Bergsma" , > "Pierre-Luc Dion" > Sent: Monday, 2

Re: 4.6 release

gt; /centos is the new one. >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Paul Angus >>> VP Technology/Cloud Architect >>> ShapeBlue Ltd >>> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus >>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter

Re: 4.6 release

rchitect >> ShapeBlue Ltd >> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue >> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS >> >> >> >> >> -Origi

Re: 4.6 release

om | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue > ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 11:56 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re:

Re: 4.6 release

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Which version (noredist or oss) have the packages on cloudstack.apt-get.eu > been built with? > ​these used to be build noredist. Has anything changed?​ I think we must replace them if it has. -- Daan

RE: 4.6 release

0 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 11:56 AM To: d

Re: 4.6 release

Paul, this is not helpful. please supply changes for what you would like to see instead so we can discuss. On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Guys, > > > > I’m out and about this morning, but I’ve noticed that the release notes > state that baseurl for 4.6 is http://cloudstack

Re: [4.6] VPN works?

> Sent: Monday, 9 November, 2015 05:55:38 > Subject: Re: [4.6] VPN works? > Nux, > > When you say SNAT is it SourceNAT IP address or you have acquired IP > address and trying VPN on it? If later is the case then it won't work. > > -Sanjeev > > On Fri, Nov

Re: [4.6] VPN works?

-- > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > > Nux! > > www.nux.ro > > > > - Original Message - > >> From: "Remi Bergsma" > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Sent: Thursday, 5 November, 2015 20:01:

Re: [4.6] VPN works?

ng Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "Remi Bergsma" >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Sent: Thursday, 5 November, 2015 20:01:01 >> Subject: Re: [4.6] VPN works? > >> Hi Lucian, >> >> As far

Re: [4.6] VPN works?

! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Remi Bergsma" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, 5 November, 2015 20:01:01 > Subject: Re: [4.6] VPN works? > Hi Lucian, > > As far as I know it works. The Marvin tests also passes. > > When I test ma

Re: [4.6] VPN works?

Hi Lucian, As far as I know it works. The Marvin tests also passes. When I test manual and connect two VPCs together, I can ping the hosts on each side. I can send you a small script that sets it up, if you want. Regards, Remi On 05/11/15 19:47, "Nux!" wrote: >Hi guys, > >I am testing 4.6

Re: 4.6 status update

FYI: once PR 1023 is merged (fixes final blocker) I'll create a 4.6 RC for us all to test. Had planned to do it tonight but there's one test failing and I want to be 100% sure it all works and all tests pass. To be resolved tomorrow. Almost there! Regards, Remi Sent from my iPhone > On 30 O

Re: [4.6] VM Snapshots no longer work with managed storage

Hi Remi, Yeah, sorry...I should have provided more details in the ticket. It was late when I encountered the issue and just wanted to record that we have a situation where data is being destroyed on accident (which seemed like a blocker to me, but I'm OK if you'd like to change that status). I wen

Re: 4.6 status update

Hi all, The blocker mentioned below has been fixed. Its PR (1008) is almost ready to be merged. In the mean while, Mike reported an issue, that is now our single blocker. Waiting for more info on it. Lots of PRs were merged, thanks to all that tested, reviewed or otherwise helped out. Could y

Re: [4.6] VM Snapshots no longer work with managed storage

Hi Mike, Thanks for reporting this issue. Can you provide some more details please? The Jira issue has none. When you put a blocker, we need to have some information so we can understand what is going on and help with debugging / fixing. Even better would be to discuss this. Let’s focus on res

Re: 4.6 status update

Hi, Not my pull request, but is this something that can be reviewed for 4.6 or is it too late? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8682 (Replace openswan ipsec with strongswan ipsec) https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 -Jan-Arve 2015-10-29 9:28 GMT+01:00 Remi Bergsma : >

Re: 4.6 status update

On 29-10-15 09:28, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi, > > We’re down to a single blocker: > > 1) CentOS 7 - systemd-tmpfiles - Operation not permitted > This is about the CentOS 7 packaging of the Management Server. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8812 > > > PRs for 4.6 > ==

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

ch is oddly very short. Andrei - Original Message - From: "Mike Tutkowski" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 23 October, 2015 9:04:35 PM Subject: Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot 4.5 should be OK. I tested this kind of stuff back th

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

Thanks! Sent from my iPhone On 25 Oct 2015, at 14:15, Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: Hi Remi, On 24-Oct-2015, at 4:43 PM, Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: 2) VR password server broken https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8957 ==> Roh

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

Hi Remi, On 24-Oct-2015, at 4:43 PM, Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: 2) VR password server broken https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8957 ==> Rohit is working on this, or not? No recent update. Please unassign if someone else needs to take over. Do you nee

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

Hey Remi, I have rebased PR 968 on top of master. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi Remi, > > I'd like to include this one in 4.6 (small and low risk): > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968/files > > Thanks, > M

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

Hi Remi, I'd like to include this one in 4.6 (small and low risk): https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968/files Thanks, Mike On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi all, > > Lots of work has been done yesterday! PRs were reviewed, tested, merged, > some were improved

Re: 4.6 status update after QA Day yesterday

Yesterday was long and tiring but very productive afaict. we should do this *some* times. congratulations on the results every body. On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi all, > > Lots of work has been done yesterday! PRs were reviewed, tested, merged, > some were improved an

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

PasswordCommand but received 2 > > > INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] > > > (AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-554aec1e) Begin cleanup expired async-jobs > > > INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] > > > (AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-554aec1e) End cleanup expired

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

wrote: > > > >> As I said in previous mail, the request should be sent to > >> KVMHypervisorGuru, not others. > >> Mike, can you try my PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954 > >> > >> 2015-10-23 8:49 GMT+02:00 Rajani Karuturi : > >

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

> > > "Are you sure you got the right type of server?" is listed again in >> the >> > > output. >> > > >> > > It seems VMwareGuru is invoked and it passes the CopyCommand on to the >> > > SSVM, which claims it doesn't support

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

;> You could also test with hypervisor gurus exclude global Param and > > exclude > > >> ovm3guru to be sure that this is the issue. (exact configuration and > its > > >> value is on bug comments) > > >> > > >> ~Rajani > > >> Sent from

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

gt; >> fix > >>>> the respective hv gurus. You can find more details on the bug which nux > >>>> shared. > >>>> > >>>> You could also test with hypervisor gurus exclude global Param and > >> exclude > >>>>

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

espective hv gurus. You can find more details on the bug which nux >>>> shared. >>>> >>>> You could also test with hypervisor gurus exclude global Param and >> exclude >>>> ovm3guru to be sure that this is the issue. (exact configuration and its

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

; >> ~Rajani > >> Sent from my Windows Phone > >> > >> From: Mike Tutkowski<mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> > >> Sent: ‎23-‎10-‎15 09:56 > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org&

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

__ >> From: Mike Tutkowski<mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> >> Sent: ‎23-‎10-‎15 09:56 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot >> >> Hi Ra

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

e that this is the issue. (exact configuration >> and its value is on bug comments) >> >> ~Rajani >> Sent from my Windows Phone >> >> From: Mike Tutkowski<mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> >> Sent: ‎23-‎10-‎15 09:56 >> To: dev@clou

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

___ > From: Mike Tutkowski<mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> > Sent: ‎23-‎10-‎15 09:56 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot > > Hi Rajani, > > Just checking t

RE: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot Hi Rajani, Just checking to make sure this is the PR you intended. It looks related to OVM3 only. Thanks! Mike On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Mike, > Can

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

Hi Rajani, Just checking to make sure this is the PR you intended. It looks related to OVM3 only. Thanks! Mike On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Mike, > Can you please test on PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962? > It fixes this issue. > > ~Rajani > > > > O

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

Mike, Can you please test on PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/962? It fixes this issue. ~Rajani On 23-Oct-2015, at 7:29 am, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > I guess I should point out that my system VMs are all running on XenServer, > but I don't think that should be a problem. > > On Th

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

I seem to be having a similar problem with deploying a VM on VMware (on 4.6). I first tried with my (SolidFire) plug-in and then with just local storage. In both cases, I get an error saying "Are you sure you got the right type of server?" On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Nux! wrote: > All I get

Re: [4.6] Can't create template or volume from snapshot

I guess I should point out that my system VMs are all running on XenServer, but I don't think that should be a problem. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I seem to be having a similar problem with deploying a VM on VMware (on > 4.6). I first

Re: [4.6] Issue with removed column in volumes table not being updated

Anyone want to take a look at this PR? https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968 It's quite short. I just needed to make sure that the volume that is to be deleted is not counted in the used-space calculation (this was throwing an exception because it wasn't supposed to be counting the volume

Re: [4.6] Issue with removed column in volumes table not being updated

Anyone who uses managed storage, but this actually effectively means just SolidFire at this point (and this code has to be implemented in the plug-in). On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Mik, isn't it more generic then the solidfire plugin? > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:20 P

Re: [4.6] Issue with removed column in volumes table not being updated

Mik, isn't it more generic then the solidfire plugin? On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > It looks like this is an issue with managed storage. > > I can actually put a fix in the SolidFire plug-in to correct what's going > on. > > I opened a JI

Re: [4.6] Issue with removed column in volumes table not being updated

It looks like this is an issue with managed storage. I can actually put a fix in the SolidFire plug-in to correct what's going on. I opened a JIRA ticket and will submit a PR once I test my changes (there are only a few lines changed). On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi

Re: [4.6] Issue with removed column in volumes table not being updated

Hi Mike, Thanks for the heads up. Please file a jira issue with details and keep us posted. Thanks, Remi Sent from my iPhone > On 22 Oct 2015, at 08:27, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > Hi, > > Just an FYI that I noticed tonight that the removed column in the volumes > table is not updated when

Re: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? "serve_password: requested password not found"

16 October, 2015 09:53:40 Subject: Re: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? "serve_password: requested password not found" Will do shortly -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: "Remi Bergsma" To: dev@cloudstack

Re: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? "serve_password: requested password not found"

October, 2015 09:53:40 > Subject: Re: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? "serve_password: requested > password not found" > Will do shortly > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message -

Re: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? "serve_password: requested password not found"

Will do shortly -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Remi Bergsma" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Friday, 16 October, 2015 09:52:24 > Subject: Re: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? &quo

Re: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? "serve_password: requested password not found"

below file in the router : > >/var/cache/cloud/passwords_10.1.1.1 > > > >Regards >sadhu > > >-Original Message- >From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 12:45 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subjec

RE: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? "serve_password: requested password not found"

er 16, 2015 12:45 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? "serve_password: requested password not found" I saw the same some weeks ago, seemed to me that the password got saved to the wrong file. Is this a basic zone? Erik Den torsdag 15. okt

Re: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? "serve_password: requested password not found"

It's a normal advanced zone (without Security Groups). -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Erik Weber" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, 15 October, 2015 20:14:34 > Subject: R

Re: [4.6] Instance passwords broken? "serve_password: requested password not found"

I saw the same some weeks ago, seemed to me that the password got saved to the wrong file. Is this a basic zone? Erik Den torsdag 15. oktober 2015 skrev Nux! følgende: > Hi, > > Now that CLOUDSTACK-8923 is fixed I could move on with other testing and > found out the deployed instances do not g

Re: 4.6 release

ev@cloudstack.apache.org>" Subject: Re: 4.6 release Ladies & Gents, I’ve just tried installing the current 4.6 from Jenkins on CentOS 7 it fails to start the management service completely (Failed at step EXEC spawning /usr/sbin/tomcat-sysd: No such file or directory) I’ve updated h

Re: 4.6 release

Ladies & Gents, I've just tried installing the current 4.6 from Jenkins on CentOS 7 it fails to start the management service completely (Failed at step EXEC spawning /usr/sbin/tomcat-sysd: No such file or directory) I've updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8812 as CentOS 7

Re: 4.6 release

current status: we have 6 blockers CLOUDSTACK-8947: Load Balancer not working with Isolated Networks - Wilder Rodrigues is working on this (PR will be ready tomorrow) CLOUDSTACK-8933: SSVm and CPVM do not survive a reboot from API - unassigned ( KVM specific issue. I spent sometime on it but, c

Re: 4.6 blockers

Hi Rajani, Since I’m busy with VOC, I will take a look at this one as well. Assigned to me. Thanks! Cheers, Wilder > On 30 Sep 2015, at 06:14, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > As per the latest BVT reports, CLOUDSTACK-8876 should also be a blocker. > I am bumping the priority of it. > > ~Rajani

Re: 4.6 blockers

As per the latest BVT reports, CLOUDSTACK-8876 should also be a blocker. I am bumping the priority of it. ~Rajani On 29-Sep-2015, at 5:06 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Just checking JIRA, we have 5 blockers for 4.6: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8920 - not assigned

Re: 4.6 blockers

logy! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Wilder Rodrigues" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: "Raja Pullela" > Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 17:34:38 > Subject: Re: 4.6 blockers > Hi Lucian, > > I’m testing Master on a dail

Re: 4.6 blockers

es" >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: "Raja Pullela" >> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 14:25:45 >> Subject: Re: 4.6 blockers > >> Go one, Nux! >> >> We haven’t tested the UI for a while! All advanced/basic zones I have created &

Re: 4.6 blockers

pache.org > Cc: "Raja Pullela" > Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 14:25:45 > Subject: Re: 4.6 blockers > Go one, Nux! > > We haven’t tested the UI for a while! All advanced/basic zones I have created > are done via Marvin. > > Will add that to the list for nex

Re: 4.6 blockers

Go one, Nux! We haven’t tested the UI for a while! All advanced/basic zones I have created are done via Marvin. Will add that to the list for next tests. Cheers, Wilder > On 29 Sep 2015, at 15:17, Nux! wrote: > > I built fresh RPMs from today's master, but the same story. I created an > is

Re: 4.6 blockers

I built fresh RPMs from today's master, but the same story. I created an issue for it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8923 I wish I could test further, but can't get past setting up secondary storage. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.

Re: [4.6] Master fails to add secondary storage network, deployment fails [Unknown parameters : zoneid]

ck.apache.org, "boris" > Sent: Monday, 28 September, 2015 23:31:14 > Subject: Re: [4.6] Master fails to add secondary storage network, deployment > fails [Unknown parameters : zoneid] > Thanks Boris, I'll package this tomorrow and test again. > > Lucian >

Re: 4.6 blockers

Indeed, this was created over night and is also against 4.5 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8920 We should not consider that a blocker, as I have done this many times without issues. Will comment and ask for more details. Regards, Remi On 29/09/15 14:21, "Wilder Rodrigues"

Re: 4.6 blockers

Hi Sebastien, We are able to use ACS + KVM for a while and I have not faced such a problem as described on CLOUDSTACK-8920 Just as a reminder, we have several tests executed agains KVM with ACS 4.6 on Sunday… all went fine. Cheers, Wilder > On 29 Sep 2015, at 13:36, Sebastien Goasguen wro

Re: [4.6] Master fails to add secondary storage network, deployment fails [Unknown parameters : zoneid]

Thanks Boris, I'll package this tomorrow and test again. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "boris" > To: "dev" > Sent: Monday, 28 September, 2015 23:16:35 > Subject: Re

Re: [4.6] Master fails to add secondary storage network, deployment fails [Unknown parameters : zoneid]

Hi Nux, The only thing I can say right now; that Jenkins job didn't run for the past week. So maybe it has already been fixed, maybe not. Could you try package it yourself and deploy again? That way you know the problem still persists. And if it does, please file a Jira ticket! Best regards, Bor

Re: [4.6] Master fails to add secondary storage network, deployment fails [Unknown parameters : zoneid]

Any ideas? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Nux!" > To: "dev" > Sent: Monday, 28 September, 2015 19:39:43 > Subject: [4.6] Master fails to add secondary storage network, deployment fails > Hello, > > Am testing 4.6 m

Re: 4.6 release

(resending in plain text) Thanks Boris(@borisroman) for fixing 3 blockers. We now have 7 blockers for the 4.6 release https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12326765 Key Summary Assignee Creator CLOUDSTACK-8881[Blocker] PF , static nat , LB , egress rul

Re: 4.6 release

Thanks Boris(@borisroman) for fixing 3 blockers. We now have 7 blockers for the 4.6 release https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12326765 T Key P Summary Assignee Creator [image: Bug] CLOUDSTACK-8881

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

OK, just an FYI that the version-checking code I put in based on Marcus' comments worked. I can now live migrate the VM. I plan to open a PR for this later tonight. On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I see a test was failing: LibvirtComputing

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

I see a test was failing: LibvirtComputingResourceTest.testMigrateCommand. I'm not sure if you can do an "or" with Mockito, but I changed a check to the following and it passes now (it was failing because a 1 was being passed in now instead of an 8 on my platform): try { veri

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

This is probably more esthetically pleasing to most people (and simpler looking): CVE-2015-3252: Get XML with sensitive information suitable for migration by using VIR_DOMAIN_XML_MIGRATABLE flag (value = 8) https://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt-

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

Sounds good Does this look reasonable (I haven't tested it yet): CVE-2015-3252: Get XML with sensitive information suitable for migration by using VIR_DOMAIN_XML_MIGRATABLE flag (value = 8) https://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virD

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

Might as well put the check in, to ensure we don't try to use flags that aren't available. On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Thanks, everyone > > Marcus - Do you think I should put in a version check or is that version of > Libvirt too old t

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

Thanks, everyone Marcus - Do you think I should put in a version check or is that version of Libvirt too old to bother supporting? On Monday, August 31, 2015, Marcus wrote: > Looks like the VIR_DOMAIN_XML_MIGRATABLE flag was introduced in v1.0.0 > (version 100 in how the Libvirt API reports

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

Looks like the VIR_DOMAIN_XML_MIGRATABLE flag was introduced in v1.0.0 (version 100 in how the Libvirt API reports), and VIR_DOMAIN_XML_SECURE was all the way back in v0.8.0 (version 8000). On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Marcus wrote: > There are a bunch of things like this in the code alr

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

There are a bunch of things like this in the code already, and they're wrapped in version checks. See _hypervisorLibvirtVersion in LibvirtComputingResource. We just need to figure out which versions need to be left out. On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I thi

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

Hi Mike, I think it is related to this, the libvirt version is really old that lacks the flags: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/5d29b63cfa98a15d7734798c5b29a43658d7f112 If VM migration flag (8) is not available, can you check if VIR_DOMAIN_XML_SECURE (flag=1) works for you, if so we

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

On 08/31/2015 07:59 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem migrating a VM from one 12.04 KVM host to another > 12.04 KVM host in the same cluster in CS 4.6. > > Anyone know why I might be receiving this error message? > > invalid argument: virDomainDefFormat: unsupported flag

Re: [4.6] Error migrating VM from KVM host

As a point of comparison, I just ran an identical test using 14.04 KVM hosts and it worked. On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem migrating a VM from one 12.04 KVM host to another > 12.04 KVM host in the same cluster

Re: [4.6] Issues deploying VM on VMware

I was thinking that, i'll be out enjoying the sun, nightynight On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > It would seem so. :) > > Well, it's almost 4 AM here...time for bed. > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > so a PR wi

Re: [4.6] Issues deploying VM on VMware

It would seem so. :) Well, it's almost 4 AM here...time for bed. On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > so a PR with only a log statement following? ;> > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Mike Tutkowski < > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > > OK, just to close this "issu

Re: [4.6] Issues deploying VM on VMware

so a PR with only a log statement following? ;> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > OK, just to close this "issue" out: > > It turns out I forgot to mount my /export/secondary to /mnt/sec. Simple as > that. :) Unfortunately the error messages I

Re: [4.6] Issues deploying VM on VMware

OK, just to close this "issue" out: It turns out I forgot to mount my /export/secondary to /mnt/sec. Simple as that. :) Unfortunately the error messages I was receiving didn't really indicate anything like that. Also, I was able to easily re-route the CopyCommand so I could debug it via Eclipse i

Re: [4.6] Issues deploying VM on VMware

Is there an easy way to avoid routing this command to the SSVM so that I can debug the code in Eclipse more easily? For example, VMwareGuru is where we decide to route this command to the SSVM. Would it be OK if I went in via the debugger and had it not route to the SSVM, so the CopyCommand would

Re: [4.6] Issues deploying VM on VMware

Here's some relevant text from the cloud.log file on the SSVM. It, too, indicates an UnsupportedAnswer exception. 2015-08-08 08:37:26,657 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Request:Seq 4-2159476021324152902: { Cmd , MgmtId: 52237617797, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{"org.

Re: [4.6] Issues deploying VM on VMware

I had a little time to look into this and here's what I found so far: An UnsupportedAnswer exception is being returned by the secondary storage VM when the CopyCommand is sent to it to copy the template from secondary to primary storage. Perhaps unrelated, but I also noticed in the host_details t

Re: [4.6] RC1 soon ?

Thanks Mike, I was thinking that the order of applying the statement parameters was reversed. Maybe you can try and apply this snippit: diff --git a/engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/db/PrimaryDataStoreDaoImpl.java b/engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datasto

Re: [4.6] RC1 soon ?

I'm doing other testing locally anyways. If you happen to find a fix, then I won't bother to revert. I can just try it again with your fix. I'll wait until tonight MST to revert. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > leasure time is on > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Mike

Re: [4.6] RC1 soon ?

leasure time is on On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Sure, I can revert it and leave it for your leisure to find an acceptable > fix to satisfy FindBugs. > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: >> >> I am now thinking of how to isolate this code to writ

Re: [4.6] RC1 soon ?

Sure, I can revert it and leave it for your leisure to find an acceptable fix to satisfy FindBugs. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I am now thinking of how to isolate this code to write a proper test. > This is not going to be successful tonight, while the original seven

Re: [4.6] RC1 soon ?

I am now thinking of how to isolate this code to write a proper test. This is not going to be successful tonight, while the original seven samurai is on tv. Maybe reverting is the best option and we live with findbugs regression for a day. I will think of a way to fix this tomorrow wit a more clear

Re: [4.6] RC1 soon ?

But reintroduced the vulnerability that findbugs was complaining about... I think the problem is in this bit: int i=0; for (Map.Entry detail : details.entrySet()) { pstmt.setString(++i,detail.getKey()); pstmt.setString(++i,det

  1   2   >