Wilder, If you check the log file, I don't think it matters really that it was done via the UI, could be wrong though.
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wilder Rodrigues" <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: "Raja Pullela" <raja.pull...@citrix.com> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 14:25:45 > Subject: Re: 4.6 blockers > Go one, Nux! > > We haven’t tested the UI for a while! All advanced/basic zones I have created > are done via Marvin. > > Will add that to the list for next tests. > > Cheers, > Wilder > > >> On 29 Sep 2015, at 15:17, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: >> >> I built fresh RPMs from today's master, but the same story. I created an >> issue >> for it: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8923 >> >> I wish I could test further, but can't get past setting up secondary storage. >> >> Lucian >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "Raja Pullela" <raja.pull...@citrix.com> >>> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 12:36:17 >>> Subject: 4.6 blockers >> >>> Just checking JIRA, we have 5 blockers for 4.6: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8920 - not assigned >>> KVM agent cannot communicate with server on port 8250 >>> >>> The other 4 are assigned and being worked on. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8915 - assigned to Wilder >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8848 - assigned to Rene >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8808 - assigned to Rajani >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697 - assigned to Wilder >>> >>> 8920 is marked as affecting 4.5.2, should it also be 4.6.0 and should we >>> have it >>> as blockers. >>> >>> -Boris from pcextreme tested master (4.6.0) yesterday in his KVM/basic zone >>> setup and he reported no issues. >>> -Nux reported an issue during testing which might be due to the Jenkins >>> jobs not >>> having run for a week. >>> >>> @Raja could you send us the latest BVT results with added details on failed >>> tests ? that would give us a somewhat compete view of the current state of >>> 4.6. >>> > >> -Sebastien
