Re: SSL and Nagle

2014-01-10 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
essage- >From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 12:01 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: Re: SSL and Nagle > >Is it? Google search indicates that it is "sometimes" a problem (with >small packets). >Wh

RE: SSL and Nagle

2014-01-10 Thread Demetrius Tsitrelis
, January 10, 2014 12:01 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SSL and Nagle Is it? Google search indicates that it is "sometimes" a problem (with small packets). When CS is the SSL client, the TCP_NO_DELAY should be set by the server (in this case hypervisors). But the nature of the i

Re: SSL and Nagle

2014-01-10 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Is it? Google search indicates that it is "sometimes" a problem (with small packets). When CS is the SSL client, the TCP_NO_DELAY should be set by the server (in this case hypervisors). But the nature of the interaction is not high bandwidth nor latency sensitive, so it shouldn't matter. When it is