Yes On 1/10/14 1:13 PM, "Demetrius Tsitrelis" <demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com> wrote:
>There are many small packets during the TLS handshake and for some of the >features such as Console Proxy so this might be worth investigating. Do >you believe it warrants opening a bug? > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 12:01 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: Re: SSL and Nagle > >Is it? Google search indicates that it is "sometimes" a problem (with >small packets). >When CS is the SSL client, the TCP_NO_DELAY should be set by the server >(in this case hypervisors). But the nature of the interaction is not high >bandwidth nor latency sensitive, so it shouldn't matter. >When it is the server, I guess we could set it, but again, nobody has >complained. > >On 1/9/14 10:58 AM, "Demetrius Tsitrelis" <dtsitre...@live.com> wrote: > >>In CloudStack's various uses of SSL, I never see that we disable Nagle. >>Isn't this a performance killer? >
