loudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:13 AM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: RE: DNS Network Domain
Thanks, it will have to be part of a bigger
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: DNS Network Domain
Not sure. I don't think it will break anything to remove this check.
On 7/24/13 3:04 AM, "Soheil Eizadi" wrote:
>Created Jira bug against this, was going to submit a UI patch:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUD
Not sure. I don't think it will break anything to remove this check.
On 7/24/13 3:04 AM, "Soheil Eizadi" wrote:
>Created Jira bug against this, was going to submit a UI patch:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3754
>
>-Soheil
>
>From: Sohei
Created Jira bug against this, was going to submit a UI patch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3754
-Soheil
From: Soheil Eizadi [seiz...@infoblox.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 6:36 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: DNS Network D
I am looking into a problem a colleague noticed: a domain for a zone was
propagated to the database but not to the virtual routers /etc/dnsmasq.conf
and /etc/vpcdnsmasq.conf files.
The domain 2.vmops-test.vmops.com is used which is a coded default.
Anybody recognizes this?
Is this the same/relate