Re: DNS Network Domain

2013-07-24 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
loudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:13 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Subject: RE: DNS Network Domain Thanks, it will have to be part of a bigger

RE: DNS Network Domain

2013-07-24 Thread Soheil Eizadi
@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: DNS Network Domain Not sure. I don't think it will break anything to remove this check. On 7/24/13 3:04 AM, "Soheil Eizadi" wrote: >Created Jira bug against this, was going to submit a UI patch: >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUD

Re: DNS Network Domain

2013-07-23 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Not sure. I don't think it will break anything to remove this check. On 7/24/13 3:04 AM, "Soheil Eizadi" wrote: >Created Jira bug against this, was going to submit a UI patch: >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3754 > >-Soheil > >From: Sohei

RE: DNS Network Domain

2013-07-23 Thread Soheil Eizadi
Created Jira bug against this, was going to submit a UI patch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3754 -Soheil From: Soheil Eizadi [seiz...@infoblox.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 6:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: DNS Network D

Re: DNS Network Domain

2013-07-03 Thread Daan Hoogland
I am looking into a problem a colleague noticed: a domain for a zone was propagated to the database but not to the virtual routers /etc/dnsmasq.conf and /etc/vpcdnsmasq.conf files. The domain 2.vmops-test.vmops.com is used which is a coded default. Anybody recognizes this? Is this the same/relate