I am looking into a problem a colleague noticed: a domain for a zone was
propagated to the database but not to the virtual routers /etc/dnsmasq.conf
and /etc/vpcdnsmasq.conf files.
The domain 2.vmops-test.vmops.com is used which is a coded default.
Anybody recognizes this?
Is this the same/related? It seems not, since the database does contain the
right value, but the result is the same.
regards,
Daan
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Soheil Eizadi <seiz...@infoblox.com> wrote:
> I found that the DNS Network Domain set for Basic Networking is not
> getting passed down to Network Plugins. I am trying to figure out how DNS
> Network Domain is suppose to work for my plugin integration.
>
> I was getting a NULL value for Basic Networking for the DNS Domain even
> though I had set a value for it in the Wizard. After I set the value in the
> database, it seems to be working but wanted to understand why it was not
> set,I found code in the system that enforces this behavior, when I try to
> set it from the API.
> -Soheil
>
> More detail logs .....
>
> The Domain is set in the Zone Setting to acme.com:
> > list zones
> count = 1
> zone:
> name = testzone
> ..
> domain = acme.com
> ..
>
> It does not get passed down to the attached network.
>
> API call "list networks" missing networkdomain field as it is NULL.
>
> > list networks
> count = 1
> network:
> id = 1065fff0-a6e2-410a-94d5-50bc72f879db
> name = defaultGuestNetwork
> acltype = Domain
> broadcastdomaintype = Native
> .....
>
>
> I also tried to set it using API to set the value but get exception:
>
> ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-20:job-20)
> Unexpected exception while executing
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.network.UpdateNetworkCmd
> com.cloud.exception.InvalidParameterValueException: NetworkOffering and
> domain suffix upgrade can be perfomed for Isolated networks only
> at
> com.cloud.network.NetworkServiceImpl.updateGuestNetwork(NetworkServiceImpl.java:1982)
> at
> com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125)
>
> Exception from here:
>
>
> // network offering and domain suffix can be updated for Isolated
> networks only in 3.0
>
> if ((networkOfferingId != null || domainSuffix != null) &&
> network.getGuestType() != GuestType.Isolated) {
>
> throw new InvalidParameterValueException("NetworkOffering and
> domain suffix upgrade can be perfomed for Isolated networks only");
>
> }
>
>
> I've patched the database and it works for me, trying to understand why we
> have code to prevent it?
>
>
> > list networks
>
> count = 1
>
> network:
>
> id = 1065fff0-a6e2-410a-94d5-50bc72f879db
>
> name = defaultGuestNetwork
>
> ...
>
> networkdomain = acme.com
>
> ....
>
>
> INFO [network.element.InfobloxElement] (consoleproxy-1:)
> InfobloxDeviceElement called to prepare Host Name soheil-test with DNS
> Domain acme.com Gateway null Netmask null with MAC 06:97:84:00:00:16 with
> IPv4 172.16.197.161
>
>
