On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:46:36PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> In reviewing the 4.2 object store enhancements, object stores are defined
> with region scope. However, there is no way to assign an object store
> definition to a region. To my way of thinking, we must be able to assign
All,
In reviewing the 4.2 object store enhancements, object stores are defined with
region scope. However, there is no way to assign an object store definition to
a region. To my way of thinking, we must be able to assign an object store to
a region to avoid transfer of large assets across WA
Well, you can add / list the other regions. I'm still trying to get my
head around why, but honestly I think it's more of a future looking
thing.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:39:14PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> Chip,
>
> Why do we have a region entity in the database if everything is assumed to b
Chip,
Why do we have a region entity in the database if everything is assumed to be
one and only region?
Thanks,
-John
On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Burwell wrote:
>
>> Chip,
>>
>> So two regions won't share the same database?
>>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Burwell wrote:
> Chip,
>
> So two regions won't share the same database?
>
Nope, that's why you have to use something (not provided yet) to sync the
acct / domain metadata between them.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Chip Childers
>
Chip,
So two regions won't share the same database?
Thanks,
-John
On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:46:36PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> In reviewing the 4.2 object store enhancements, object stores are defined
>> with region scope. H
