gt;
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On 11/8/18 11:20 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
>> > >>>> I think these is legacy and a guess back in the day. It was 50
>> > at one
>> > >>> point and
1/8/18 11:20 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
> > >>>> I think these is legacy and a guess back in the day. It was 50
> > at one
> > >>> point and it was lifted higher a few releases. ago.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I see. I'm about to do a test wi
m about to do a test with a bunch of 128GB hypervisors and
> >>> spawning a lot of 128M VMs. Trying to see where the limit might
> be and
> >>> also stress the VR a bit by loading a lot of DHCP entries.
> >>>
> >>> Wido
>
higher a few releases. ago.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I see. I'm about to do a test with a bunch of 128GB hypervisors and
> >>> spawning a lot of 128M VMs. Trying to see where the limit might be and
> >>> also stress the VR a bit by loading a
;> point and it was lifted higher a few releases. ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I see. I'm about to do a test with a bunch of 128GB hypervisors and
>>>>> spawning a lot of 128M VMs. Trying to see where the limit might be and
>>>
h of 128GB hypervisors and
> >>> spawning a lot of 128M VMs. Trying to see where the limit might be and
> >>> also stress the VR a bit by loading a lot of DHCP entries.
> >>>
> >>> Wido
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> &
gt; also stress the VR a bit by loading a lot of DHCP entries.
>>>
>>> Wido
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
gt; >
> > >
> > > ____
> > > From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
> > > To: dev
> > > Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit
> > >
> > > Hi all, +1 for higher numbers.
>
> > From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
> > Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit
> >
> > Hi all, +1 for higher numbers.
> >
> > чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:32, Wido den Hollander :
see where the limit might be and
also stress the VR a bit by loading a lot of DHCP entries.
Wido
>
>
>
>
> From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit
>
> Hi all, +1
ago.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit
>
> Hi all, +1 for higher numbers.
>
> чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:32, Wido den Hollander :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see that for
I think these is legacy and a guess back in the day. It was 50 at one point and
it was lifted higher a few releases. ago.
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:58 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: KVM Max Guests Limit
Hi all, +1 for higher numbers
Hi all, +1 for higher numbers.
чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:32, Wido den Hollander :
> Hi,
>
> I see that for KVM we set the limit to 144 guests by default, can
> anybody tell me why we have this limit set to 144?
>
> Searching a bit I found this:
> https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-kvm-limits
Hi,
I see that for KVM we set the limit to 144 guests by default, can
anybody tell me why we have this limit set to 144?
Searching a bit I found this:
https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-kvm-limits
"This guest limit does not apply to Red Hat Enterprise Linux with
Unlimited Guests. There is n
14 matches
Mail list logo
