Hi Rajani,
Since I’m busy with VOC, I will take a look at this one as well.
Assigned to me.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 30 Sep 2015, at 06:14, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
>
> As per the latest BVT reports, CLOUDSTACK-8876 should also be a blocker.
> I am bumping the priority of it.
>
> ~Rajani
As per the latest BVT reports, CLOUDSTACK-8876 should also be a blocker.
I am bumping the priority of it.
~Rajani
On 29-Sep-2015, at 5:06 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Just checking JIRA, we have 5 blockers for 4.6:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8920 - not assigned
logy!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Wilder Rodrigues"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: "Raja Pullela"
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 17:34:38
> Subject: Re: 4.6 blockers
> Hi Lucian,
>
> I’m testing Master on a dail
es"
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: "Raja Pullela"
>> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 14:25:45
>> Subject: Re: 4.6 blockers
>
>> Go one, Nux!
>>
>> We haven’t tested the UI for a while! All advanced/basic zones I have created
&
pache.org
> Cc: "Raja Pullela"
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 14:25:45
> Subject: Re: 4.6 blockers
> Go one, Nux!
>
> We haven’t tested the UI for a while! All advanced/basic zones I have created
> are done via Marvin.
>
> Will add that to the list for nex
t; www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Sebastien Goasguen"
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "Raja Pullela"
>> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 12:36:17
>> Subject: 4.6 blockers
>
>> Just checking JIRA, we have 5 blockers fo
logy!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Sebastien Goasguen"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "Raja Pullela"
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2015 12:36:17
> Subject: 4.6 blockers
> Just checking JIRA, we have 5 blockers for 4.6:
>
> https://
Indeed, this was created over night and is also against 4.5
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8920
We should not consider that a blocker, as I have done this many times without
issues. Will comment and ask for more details.
Regards,
Remi
On 29/09/15 14:21, "Wilder Rodrigues"
Hi Sebastien,
We are able to use ACS + KVM for a while and I have not faced such a problem as
described on CLOUDSTACK-8920
Just as a reminder, we have several tests executed agains KVM with ACS 4.6 on
Sunday… all went fine.
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 29 Sep 2015, at 13:36, Sebastien Goasguen wro
Just checking JIRA, we have 5 blockers for 4.6:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8920 - not assigned
KVM agent cannot communicate with server on port 8250
The other 4 are assigned and being worked on.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8915 - assigned to Wilder
http
10 matches
Mail list logo
