Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150618T1117)

So this makes the vote pass. more votes/testers would have been nice but since it is really a very minor fix agains 4.4.3 I think we're good. thanks everybody, On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Basic Zone deployment with KVM/Ubuntu-14.04 and basic vm lifecycl

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150618T1117)

+1 (binding) Basic Zone deployment with KVM/Ubuntu-14.04 and basic vm lifecycle operations. Here’s the repository built for everyone’s consumption: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.4/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.4/ > On 23-Jun-2015, at 10:4

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150618T1117)

Hi, Did some general tests on this release and would like to share my +1. Details below... Environment test Management Server => CentOS 7.1 1 Host XenServer 6.2 Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router basic setup ... === Tes

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150618T1117)

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > I can prepare a PR for the release notes and document the new setting. You > can then merge it when the release passes. Or should we do this in another > way? This is fine but it is in the release even if it doesn't pass so no sense waitin

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150618T1117)

Hi Daan, Thanks for fixing and testing it! After DevOpsDays Ams I will also give it a go. I can prepare a PR for the release notes and document the new setting. You can then merge it when the release passes. Or should we do this in another way? Regards, Remi > On 22 Jun 2015, at 16:35, Daan H

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150618T1117)

tested specifically the blocker issue in a two host cluster with an isolated network. both the option values false and true gave expected result on setting router.reboot.when.outofband.migrated based on this behavior and the fact that setup worked smoothly +1 (binding) one point of attention is

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150618T1117)

Hello, +1 (binding) Tests on Ubuntu 14.04.2 (1 mgr, 2 nodes, 1 nfs), advanced network fresh install, NFS storage, KVM, some tests on HA (crash vm/restore), SystemVM shape, some tests with templates, and CS<->cloud-init on debian. Tests on Ubuntu 14.04.2 (All-in-one ansible installation[1]),

[VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150618T1117)

Hi All, I've created a 4.4.4 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150618T1117 Commit: 6f41061e1428527c3f826d268377557ce607196b List of changes: https://git-wip-us.ap

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

done something to the code that might mean it's fixed. please all have a go. I will make a new RC when in the office and some other work is done. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Sure, but I have no time right now to implement the fix for the latest > issue we found. If I ge

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

Sure, but I have no time right now to implement the fix for the latest issue we found. If I get time I will look at releasing as well (or if someone else implements it) On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Hi Daan, > > Do you plan to do another RC of 4.4.4 soon ? > > Thanks, >

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

Hi Daan, Do you plan to do another RC of 4.4.4 soon ? Thanks, On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Wilder Rodrigues < wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I took the day to go through the 4.4.4 release and run some tests on it. > Since I also tested using KVM hypervisors running on

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

Hi all, I took the day to go through the 4.4.4 release and run some tests on it. Since I also tested using KVM hypervisors running on top of a centOS 7.1 machines, for that my vote will be 0 because the support is experimental. Concerning the tests executed against XenServer62, I will give a +1

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

due to the discussion in http://markmail.org/message/ahthu3p7fhecmas3 I am cancelling this rc. please keep testing though ;) Op wo 3 jun. 2015 om 13:38 schreef Rohit Yadav : > I tested on Ubuntu (KVM) host and it worked for me. > > > On 03-Jun-2015, at 12:49 pm, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > > Ro

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

I tested on Ubuntu (KVM) host and it worked for me. > On 03-Jun-2015, at 12:49 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > Rohit, I get reports from Wilder that the kvm agent install doesn't work. > did you test that as well? > > Op wo 3 jun. 2015 om 12:47 schreef Rohit Yadav : > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Tested de

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

What OS was that on? I can test it :) Btw.. if there's already a cert in the DB and you delete the cloudmanagement.keystore, a corrupted one gets exported to the filesystem which makes the server fail to talk to the agent throwing an error on the agent side (java.io.IOException: Connection closed

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

Rohit, I get reports from Wilder that the kvm agent install doesn't work. did you test that as well? Op wo 3 jun. 2015 om 12:47 schreef Rohit Yadav : > +1 (binding) > > Tested deployment with Basic Zone with SG using Ubuntu 14.04 as KVM host, > tested basic vm lifecycles. > > Here’s the repo buil

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

+1 (binding) Tested deployment with Basic Zone with SG using Ubuntu 14.04 as KVM host, tested basic vm lifecycles. Here’s the repo built from this RC: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ > On 02-Jun-2015, at 7:40 pm, Milamber wrote: > > Hello, > > +1 > > Tests on Ubuntu 14.04.2

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

Hello, +1 Tests on Ubuntu 14.04.2 (1 mgr, 2 nodes, 1 nfs), basic fresh install, NFS storage, KVM, tests on HA (crash vm/restore), SystemVM shape Tests on Ubuntu 14.04.2 (All-in-one ansible installation[1]), tests upgrade 4.4.3 -> 4.4.4 : OK, test upgrade 4.4.4 -> 4.5.1 (KO known issue will

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

It is to be fixed in 4.5 not in 4.4. Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 23:07 schreef Milamber : > Hello, > > The new RC works fine, but if I would like upgrade to 4.5.1, the No > Upgrade Path error come. > > That is on the Release Notes? Or that is a bug? Or wait the 4.5.2? > > Milamber > > > === > 2015-06-01

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

Hello, The new RC works fine, but if I would like upgrade to 4.5.1, the No Upgrade Path error come. That is on the Release Notes? Or that is a bug? Or wait the 4.5.2? Milamber === 2015-06-01 21:38:59,233 INFO [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:null) Grabbing lock to check for database u

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

erratum: The link in below mail for the git branch points to the wrong branch, the text is pointing to the right branch: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150601T1542 Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 15:49 schreef Daan Hoogland : > Hi All, > > I've c

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

No prob Daan :) Like it said, it still needs some testing before merging as is into the code base. If you don't care much about that security issue (the risk of a XSS attack to get your sessionkey, for which the attacker would also need network access to your server, which he normally wouldn't if y

[VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150601T1542)

Hi All, I've created a 4.4.4 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ 4.4-RC

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Andrija, Rafael, I took a few minutes to look at it. It doesn't apply even after some simple tinkering. Hope you will once forgive me for not taking this in the next RC. baking it now Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 15:22 schreef Andrija Panic : > :) please do - send the patch. > > Thanks Rafael > > On 1 Ju

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

:) please do - send the patch. Thanks Rafael On 1 June 2015 at 15:16, Rafael Fonseca wrote: > Hi Andrija, > > The first fix i had proposed might not have been a problem, besides the > security issue. > I have now updated the PR to fix the security issue, but tests for other > authentication met

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Hi Andrija, The first fix i had proposed might not have been a problem, besides the security issue. I have now updated the PR to fix the security issue, but tests for other authentication methods must be performed before a merge. I think Rohit is looking into testing the SAML plugin with it, if it

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

This will fix the deb tests on jenkins permanently :) The packaging always needed a manual update in deb/changelog after a change in pom.xml version. If this step was forgotten or skipped, it would break. Fixed for now and forever hopefully :) On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 14:37 schreef Erik Weber : > Do we have travis jobs to test packaging? > No, not in travis. in jenkins for rpm, yes. for deb, I think these are broken for a while now. > > -- > Erik > >

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Do we have travis jobs to test packaging? -- Erik On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I noticed, will look at travis and merge > > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 14:27 schreef Rafael Fonseca : > > > Hey Daan, > > I've also created a PR for fixing a couple of deb packaging issues for >

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Daan, Rafael, what about Rafael's https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/308 - it need to be reviewsed by security time - fine, but can we merge this, and undo alter, if necessary ? On 1 June 2015 at 14:26, Rafael Fonseca wrote: > Hey Daan, > I've also created a PR for fixing a couple of deb

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

I noticed, will look at travis and merge Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 14:27 schreef Rafael Fonseca : > Hey Daan, > I've also created a PR for fixing a couple of deb packaging issues for 4.4 > Have a look here: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/339 > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Erik Webe

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Hey Daan, I've also created a PR for fixing a couple of deb packaging issues for 4.4 Have a look here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/339 On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Erik Weber wrote: > Sounds reasonable to me. > > -- > Erik > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Daan Hoogland > wr

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Sounds reasonable to me. -- Erik On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > If no objections I will reset the default to 4.4.1 (the lowest required > version) include Rafaels pr for kvm/centos packaging and create a new rc. > > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:54 schreef Daan Hoogland >: >

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Hello Daan, No objections. And thanks for the new RC. Milamber On 01/06/2015 12:17, Daan Hoogland wrote: If no objections I will reset the default to 4.4.1 (the lowest required version) include Rafaels pr for kvm/centos packaging and create a new rc. Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:54 schreef Daan Ho

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

If no objections I will reset the default to 4.4.1 (the lowest required version) include Rafaels pr for kvm/centos packaging and create a new rc. Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:54 schreef Daan Hoogland : > So we will have to include an update in every release and we will probably > forget about that pre

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

So we will have to include an update in every release and we will probably forget about that pretty soon. Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:49 schreef Remi Bergsma : > I'd say, as a default: 4.4.0 will be nice for any 4.4.x release, and 4.5.0 > for 4.5.x etc. This is also close to what was hard-coded befor

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

I'd say, as a default: 4.4.0 will be nice for any 4.4.x release, and 4.5.0 for 4.5.x etc. This is also close to what was hard-coded before. Regards, Remi 2015-06-01 11:33 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland : > Guess we'll be making a new rc. The value can be 0.0.0 for my part, it must > be an operator dec

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Guess we'll be making a new rc. The value can be 0.0.0 for my part, it must be an operator decision to set the MinVRVersion if it must be higher. It will always be an upgrade matter and any seeded template should be accepted as per the installation notes. Of course the other side of the issue is wh

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Please note: I my case, there isn't an upgrade, I have the issue with 4.4.3 or 4.4.4 fresh installation (out of the box, from git tag 4.4-RC20150529T2004) On 01/06/2015 07:22, Erik Weber wrote: If it means that all upgrades are unable to do VR related tasks ( starting VMs for one.. ), I'd

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

On 01/06/2015 06:40, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi, Looks like MinVRVersionCK (minreq.sysvmtemplate.version) setting is a ConfigKey, I’m not sure about 4.4 but on 4.5/master it creates an entry in configuration table if unavailable. On my fresh CS 4.5.1 installation, the minreq.sysvmtemplate.versi

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

If it means that all upgrades are unable to do VR related tasks ( starting VMs for one.. ), I'd call that regression and redo. Relying on all our users to do manual fixing just because we don't want to call off the RC is bad IMHO. -- Erik On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > H

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Hi, Looks like MinVRVersionCK (minreq.sysvmtemplate.version) setting is a ConfigKey, I’m not sure about 4.4 but on 4.5/master it creates an entry in configuration table if unavailable. If upgrading from 4.4.2/4.4.1 to 4.4.4 does not create this we can either add it in the upgrade path or add in

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Hi Milamber, I think it is new in 4.4.4, backported from master but Daan can confirm. 4.4.1 refers to the system vm template version and not per se to CloudStack 4.4.1. There is no reason to upgrade it so it can stay at 4.4.1 again as the upgrade procedure is much easier and faster without upg

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Hello Remi, Ok thanks. I execute this SQL request below, and now it's works. INSERT INTO `cloud`.`configuration`(`category`, `instance`, `component`, `name`, `value`, `description`, `default_value`, `updated`, `scope`, `is_dynamic`) VALUES('Advanced', 'DEFAULT', 'management-server', 'minreq.

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

By the way, https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/291 should also be ported to 4.4 The build http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-deb/ has been failing for the past eight months and this will fix it. This should not depend on parsing the version in the changelog, a

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Hi Milamber, It is a global setting, although it appears not to be present in the cloud.configuration table by default (so you cannot find it). If you insert it, it works. I also played with the upgrade and did insert the setting, since at work we had changed the minimal version to a non stan

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Hello Rohit, On 31/05/2015 11:57, Rohit Yadav wrote: +1 (binding) Here’s a test repository you can use for convenience built out of this tag/RC: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ Deployed Basic Zone with/without SG, tested vm lifecycle. The VM deployment failed for me as minre

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

+1 (binding) Here’s a test repository you can use for convenience built out of this tag/RC: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ Deployed Basic Zone with/without SG, tested vm lifecycle. The VM deployment failed for me as minreq.sysvmtemplate.version global setting was set to 4.4.4

[VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4

Hi All, I've created a 4.4.4 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ 4.4-RC