Hello Daan,
No objections. And thanks for the new RC.
Milamber
On 01/06/2015 12:17, Daan Hoogland wrote:
If no objections I will reset the default to 4.4.1 (the lowest required
version) include Rafaels pr for kvm/centos packaging and create a new rc.
Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:54 schreef Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>:
So we will have to include an update in every release and we will probably
forget about that pretty soon.
Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:49 schreef Remi Bergsma <r...@remi.nl>:
I'd say, as a default: 4.4.0 will be nice for any 4.4.x release, and 4.5.0
for 4.5.x etc. This is also close to what was hard-coded before.
Regards,
Remi
2015-06-01 11:33 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>:
Guess we'll be making a new rc. The value can be 0.0.0 for my part, it
must
be an operator decision to set the MinVRVersion if it must be higher. It
will always be an upgrade matter and any seeded template should be
accepted
as per the installation notes. Of course the other side of the issue is
whether a version will work at all. The operator can create a version of
the template with their own versioning scheme, however. I should be
writing
all this in another {DISCUSS]-thread.
cancelling the RC to add code for Bruno's requirement.
Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 08:35 schreef Milamber <milam...@apache.org>:
Please note: I my case, there isn't an upgrade, I have the issue with
4.4.3 or 4.4.4 fresh installation (out of the box, from git tag
4.4-RC20150529T2004)
On 01/06/2015 07:22, Erik Weber wrote:
If it means that all upgrades are unable to do VR related tasks (
starting
VMs for one.. ), I'd call that regression and redo.
Relying on all our users to do manual fixing just because we don't
want
to
call off the RC is bad IMHO.
