> On Feb 16, 2016, at 7:01 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> We have a couple of things we need collaborate on:
>
> 1. Per Remi's request below, we need some folks familiar with the release
> process to either help, or document steps required to completed the release
> notes, docs and we
Team,
We have a couple of things we need collaborate on:
1. Per Remi's request below, we need some folks familiar with the release
process to either help, or document steps required to completed the release
notes, docs and website updates.
2 Remi has spearheaded the charge for the last couple o
Hi all,
After 72+ hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.7.1 [1] *passes* with 4 PMC + 0
non-PMC votes.
+1 (PMC / binding)
* Boris
* Remi
* Daan
* Milamber
+1 (non binding)
none
0
none
-1
Tomasz
Thanks to everyone participating.
I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours
Hello,
My vote +1 (binding)
My tests (Tests are passed on a CloudStack (1mgr+4nodes+2nfs) in real
servers topology) :
1/ Fresh install of 4.7.1RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.3 + KVM + NFS : OK
Some standard tests (create vm, migration, HA, create networks (normal
and RVR), create user, creat
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> As a matter of order, I have until Saturday afternoon, right? I am seeing
> reasonably good results so far but I need to find time to test in an
> advanced zone with security groups and zone wide primary storage as we use
> in Leaseweb. (te
not necessarily
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
>> if you believe you
resent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error.
>
e sender if you
believe you have received this email in error.
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Zięba [mailto:t.a.zi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 22 January 2016 5:12 PM
To: dev mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1
Hi all,
-1 https://issues
y 2016 5:12 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1
Hi all,
-1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9251
Best Regards
Tom
2016-01-20 23:27 GMT+01:00 Remi Bergsma :
> Hi all,
>
> I've created a 4.7.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> u
Hi all,
-1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9251
Best Regards
Tom
2016-01-20 23:27 GMT+01:00 Remi Bergsma :
> Hi all,
>
> I've created a 4.7.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up
> for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/re
<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>|
w: www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
From: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 11:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1
Hi Guys,
Cento
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Remi Bergsma
wrote:
> I’ll keep the votes open until Monday evening CET.
>
> Would that be OK?
>
fine, thanks. I'll do some extra testing over the weekend.
--
Daan
u have received this email in error.
-Original Message-
From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Friday, 22 January 2016 12:29 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1
Hi Daan,
Since we started Wednesday ~2300 CET there’s goi
Hi Daan,
Since we started Wednesday ~2300 CET there’s going to be a weekend in the 72
hour time window. Therefore I’ll keep the votes open until Monday evening CET.
Would that be OK?
Regards,
Remi
On 22/01/16 11:11, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>As a matter of order, I have until Saturday after
As a matter of order, I have until Saturday afternoon, right? I am seeing
reasonably good results so far but I need to find time to test in an
advanced zone with security groups and zone wide primary storage as we use
in Leaseweb. (tentative +1)
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Remi Bergsma
wrot
Hi all,
My vote: +1 (binding) based on the integration tests below. These were tested
against a 2-node KVM cluster based on CentOS7 (RPMs from the RC branch). The
management server also runs CentOS7.
In our employee cloud we run the same code against 2 XenServer 6.5 clusters.
All works fine. E
Hi Pierre-Luc,
The only reference I find is in the schema-460to461.sql file. But since you
already run 4.6.1 it is not executed.
How did you upgrade to 4.6.1 before?
Regards,
Remi
On 21/01/16 15:30, "Pierre-Luc Dion" wrote:
>Did test upgrade from 4.6.1 to 4.7.1 and when I look into Affinit
Did test upgrade from 4.6.1 to 4.7.1 and when I look into Affinity Groups
tab in the ui I see the following error message:
DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@23f3ef77: SELECT
affinity_group_view.id, affinity_group_view.name, affinity_group_view.type,
affinity_group_view.descr
Hi all,
I’ve tested this release extensively over the past few weeks. It’s getting
better and better!
Vote: +1 (binding)
All integration tests succeeded and deployment on both Xen and KVM went fine.
Currently running this release in beta!
Boris Roman Schrijver
Mission Critical Engineer
Hi all,
I've created a 4.7.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.7.1-RC20160120T2318
Commit: 5ea07dc93799f28dd6c268b17514867d92dc53f7
Source release (checksums and signa
20 matches
Mail list logo
