Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-07 Thread Daan Hoogland
tected during the RC >>> process but unfortunately not fixed. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Geoff Higginbottom >>> >>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 >>> >>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-06 Thread Rajani Karuturi
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 >> >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] >> Sent: 06 March 2015 14:32 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-06 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi all, Please don't panic. It's a presentation bug and does not affect internal operations (based on what I read the code). So, if cidrlists are present in DB they will be applied, only the list call won't return anything as the field is transient and lazy loaded. I've tried to fix it now: http

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-06 Thread Rohit Yadav
14:32 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4 Can we release 4.5.0, and see how it could be fixed in 4.5.1 ? On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote: All, Unfortunately I've been

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-06 Thread Andrija Panic
0 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > -Original Message- > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] > Sent: 06 March 2015 14:32 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-06 Thread Geoff Higginbottom
-Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] Sent: 06 March 2015 14:32 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4 Can we release 4.5.0, and see how it could be fixed in 4.5.1 ? On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Geoff

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-06 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Can we release 4.5.0, and see how it could be fixed in 4.5.1 ? On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > All, > > Unfortunately I've been travelling and not had chance to test fully. > > I did manage to test last night and found this bug i

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-06 Thread Geoff Higginbottom
All, Unfortunately I've been travelling and not had chance to test fully. I did manage to test last night and found this bug is still present which I consider a Blocker. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel I kn

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-05 Thread Erik Weber
Excellent! Good work everyone involved :-) -- Erik On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:12 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi all, > > After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.0 *passes* with > 4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. > > +1 (PMC / binding) > Marcus > Pierre-Luc > Mike > Chip > > +1 (non bindin

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-05 Thread Rohit Yadav
Congrats everyone and thanks! On Friday 06 March 2015 02:42 AM, David Nalley wrote: Hi all, After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.0 *passes* with 4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) Marcus Pierre-Luc Mike Chip +1 (non binding) Rohit Nux 0 none -1 none Thanks to ever

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-05 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Congrats!!! - Original Message - > From: "David Nalley" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, 5 March, 2015 9:12:50 PM > Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4 > Hi all, > After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.0 *

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

2015-03-05 Thread David Nalley
Hi all, After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.0 *passes* with 4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) Marcus Pierre-Luc Mike Chip +1 (non binding) Rohit Nux 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out, likely for