suffer OpenStack's faith - which
> is what they go through now - of only specific version x.y.z module can
> work with another x.y.z module.
>
> Regards
> ilya
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> >
work with
another x.y.z module.
Regards
ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 4:57 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or
> revamp release process
&g
Some more remarks on this:
Another model is of keeping quality high is controlling what gets in
per release. This would go against the opensource model somewhat. You
would need e release manager like me and I strongly advice against
that.
Giving users more control on what goes into their system i
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> We can still use scheduled release as we do now and yet have some agility.
>
> An idea was passed around before if we can modularize ACS in future releases
> VS being it monolithic.
>
> We can still have a core as is, but additional compone
ot;plugins" (or whatever the proper term is)
would ease the release cycle and give us flexibility in my opinion.
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:22 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] mov
Accidentally just sent this to Daan.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mike Tutkowski
Date: Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp
release process
To: Daan Hoogland
I think that would be a really good use of a
itial problem (because something didn't
>> work
>> > in master).
>> >
>> > Again, I don't claim to have any solution for this problem, but I am
>> happy
>> > to help brainstorm.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 24, 20
;
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Marcus Sorensen > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> -Original Message-
> > > >> From: Marcus S
;
> > >
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:25 PM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] move away from
lto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:25 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp
> >> release process
> >>
> >> On Sep 23, 2013 1:03 PM, &
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:00:32AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>> I guess I'm in the minority though, since we're the
>> only ones discussing it.
>
> No you are not. Personally, I'm thinking about this problem a bit
> before adding my 2 c
is this work a workshop to get at least a core group of us in line. We
all have ideas and a lot of good ones are buried under an ton weighing
archive of mails.
Daan
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:00:32AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>> I guess
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:00:32AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> I guess I'm in the minority though, since we're the
> only ones discussing it.
No you are not. Personally, I'm thinking about this problem a bit
before adding my 2 cents. Don't take that silence as thinking we are
"ok".
Short ve
ailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
>> > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 11:38 AM
>> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > > Subject: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp
>> > > release process
>> > >
>> > >
On Sep 23, 2013 1:03 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 11:38 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: [PROPOSAL]
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 11:38 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp
> release process
>
> Guys, I think w
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:25 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp
> release process
>
> On Sep 23
Guys, I think we are not currently in a state to handle time-based
releases. Until we can cut master at any time and have it releasable,
or at least at a reasonable RC-level matching minimum tested
requirements, it's just going to continue to be an exercise in
frustration to cut RCs simply becaus
18 matches
Mail list logo
