Should be okay for the moment. Except we forget updating links on the
wiki with jenkins changing. But I wouldn't point these to the users as
'working' documentation. We should get the corrected docs on the site.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:26:22PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> by latest i mean the
by latest i mean the results of jenkins doc build jobs.
and yes I mean either copy the build results to the site or the wiki
on the one hand and just set links to the artifacts in jenkins on the
other hand.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> By latest you mean something
By latest you mean something in those pages is outdated? I haven't
documented all the jobs yet.
I think it would be nice to add links to our community repositories
etc. Is this what you mean by artifacts?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:17:13PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Thanks Prasanna,
>
> shoul
Thanks Prasanna,
should we publish some 'latest' docs or is this not desirable? We
could do with links to the artifacts, i imagine.
Daan
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've added some missing documentation on how our build systems
> (jenkins) are setup. I t
Hi,
I've added some missing documentation on how our build systems
(jenkins) are setup. I think I've addressed most questions that came
up in threads on this mailing list. If you would like to understand
how all this is setup please go through the following wiki pages: I've
put in pictures and eve
