Should be okay for the moment. Except we forget updating links on the
wiki with jenkins changing. But I wouldn't point these to the users as
'working' documentation. We should get the corrected docs on the site.

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:26:22PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> by latest i mean the results of jenkins doc build jobs.
> 
> and yes I mean either copy the build results to the site or the wiki
> on the one hand and just set links to the artifacts in jenkins on the
> other hand.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> > By latest you mean something in those pages is outdated? I haven't
> > documented all the jobs yet.
> >
> > I think it would be nice to add links to our community repositories
> > etc. Is this what you mean by artifacts?
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:17:13PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> >> Thanks Prasanna,
> >>
> >> should we publish some 'latest' docs or is this not desirable? We
> >> could do with links to the artifacts, i imagine.
> >>
> >> Daan
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I've added some missing documentation on how our build systems
> >> > (jenkins) are setup. I think I've addressed most questions that came
> >> > up in threads on this mailing list. If you would like to understand
> >> > how all this is setup please go through the following wiki pages: I've
> >> > put in pictures and everything :)
> >> >
> >> > Build systems:
> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Cy-VAQ
> >> >
> >> > Test infrastructure:
> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/_y7VAQ
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Prasanna.,
> >> >
> >> > ------------------------
> >> > Powered by BigRock.com
> >> >
> >
> > --
> > Prasanna.,
> >
> > ------------------------
> > Powered by BigRock.com
> >

-- 
Prasanna.,

------------------------
Powered by BigRock.com

Reply via email to