Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-216187512
tag:pickup
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-134929897
We should keep it open though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-134929830
@bhaisaab this came out from a roadmap item suggested by @pyr, but it seems
he has not had time to review and comment. So this is a bit stuck I am afraid.
---
If you
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-134928152
anyone working on progressing this PR, I really like it and it has some
good things; if no one is I can help take over some things in future (cc
@rsafonseca)
---
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-129040864
@rsafonseca Can you close this PR? If I understand correctly the work will
be split over multiple new PRs. Hope you're doing OK, talk to you soon.
---
If your p
Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-121889370
Hi @wido
I've been waiting for feedback from Pyr on a thread in the dev mailing list
with subject "4.6" if you want to look it up.
I will nevertheless do
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-121150878
Hi @wido ,
On this comment
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110239298 I
suggested that the PR should be split so we could
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-121140056
Any progress on this PR? Since I really do like the proposal, but my
knowledge of Jetty/Tomcat is indeed to limited.
I can test the packaging, but I have no ide
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110320351
Thanks @rsafonseca, your efforts are well appreciated, don't think
otherwise.
Small changes equals, atleast usually, a smaller set of testing.
The Clo
Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110265493
Hi @terbolous
I'm here to help, so i'll try to break it down a bit in the coming days as
i mentioned :)
Testing this will take some time anyway, and
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110257923
I'm with Wilder & co on this.
If you break it down, it's easier to test and thus merge.
For instance, the mysql licensing could now potentially hol
Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110255489
Hi @wilderrodrigues , @serverchief
Thank you for your feedback :)
I understand your point, but since there are a lot of changes and most are
inte
Github user serverchief commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110242990
I'm with Wilder on this. Thank you for being active and submitting really
useful patches - its much appreciated. However, it would be best if you can
split the c
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110239298
Hi there @rsafonseca
Cool to see you contribution, thanks for that, but I think the PRs should
be broken down. You listed 11 changes and said that
I assume the ASF turns their nose up to this? Have we discussed this before?
https://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/foss-exception/
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:16 PM, creategui wrote:
> Github user creategui commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#
Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110161431
How about the FOSS license exception?
https://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/foss-exception/
FOSS License List
License NameVersion(s)/
Github user creategui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110160470
bummer that Apache does not allow LGPL.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Looks like that is LGPL
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:57 PM, creategui wrote:
> Github user creategui commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110153681
>
> How about switching to https:
Github user creategui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110153681
How about switching to https://downloads.mariadb.org/client-java/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user ke4qqq commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110152435
We can't bundle mysql-connector-java. It is licensed as GPL which is CatX
and thus verboten. We can make it a system dependency.
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110151397
Hi @terbolous
I'm in no way a licensing expert, but don't think there's any
incompatibility with the licensing.. but I'll leave that for the experts to say
t
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110145052
By the way, what kind of testing has this undergone? In particular I'm
interested in upgrade testing, as we don't want to break any old installations.
---
If your
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372#issuecomment-110144112
I'm by no means an expert on this, but isn't the reason we didn't ship the
mysql connector previously due to licensing? @ke4qqq or @runseb wanna chime in?
---
If
GitHub user rsafonseca opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/372
Embedded Tomcat & Jetty
Well, this spruces things up a bit :)
Some of the features/fixes (i may have forgotten a couple as this involved
a lot of changes ;) )
- Embedded Tom
24 matches
Mail list logo
