Re: [DISCUSS] WIP PRs and contribution transparency

2019-04-02 Thread Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue https://www.shapeblue.com From: Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT) Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 6:33:06 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] WIP PRs and contribution transparency > In order to be more transparent, I would li

Re: [DISCUSS] WIP PRs and contribution transparency

2019-04-02 Thread Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT)
> In order to be more transparent, I would like to propose that we put > something like ' [WIP DO NOT MERGE]' in the PR title as my colleagues > and I have done on some new PRs you can follow. Labels cannot be used > as not every contributor is a committer. Once the PR is ready for > merging, we c

Re: [DISCUSS] WIP PRs and contribution transparency

2019-03-29 Thread Sven Vogel
Hi Rohit, We see like the same. Our team will do it. LGTM :) Sven __ Sven Vogel Teamlead Platform EWERK RZ GmbH Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig P +49 341 42649 - 11 F +49 341 42649 - 18 s.vo...@ewerk.com www.ewerk.com Geschäftsführer: Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Frank Richter, Gerhard Hoyer

[DISCUSS] WIP PRs and contribution transparency

2019-03-28 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, I want to explore a way to be more transparent with the community on PRs especially new features that we're working on (my colleagues and me at ShapeBlue), however, like every organization, we have our internal processes around development, testing, review and internal validation before a