e.
>>> The
>>> main question I think will come from the Linux variants. Are all of them
>>> shipping with jdk1.7 now?
>>>
>>> --Alex
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hug
f Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:10 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades
Hey all,
Sorry for the threadomancy, but the discussion have become relevant again
with the current issues with the libvirt library. Of co
-Original Message-
> > From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:10 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades
> >
> > Hey al
e-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:10 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java 7, tomcat 7 and further upgrades
>
> Hey all,
>
> Sorry for the threadomancy, but the
Hey all,
Sorry for the threadomancy, but the discussion have become relevant again with
the current issues with the libvirt library. Of course this could also be
solved by updating the libvirt library with a jdk6 version. Still it might be
good to revisit this topic.
It appears not to be possi
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:18:40PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> I am +1 for Java7. However, I would like to propose ridding
> ourselves of Tomcat entirely and embedding a network stack such as
> Netty (http://netty.io) with a servlet bridge. We have one JSP in
> the system that generate
Hi,
On 06/27/2013 12:36 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Hey everyone,
Back in February 2013 Oracle announced the end of public support for java 1.6
already. Today we are still using java 1.6 as our supported platform. I've been
looking at the next generation of linux distributions (well mainly at F
All,
I am +1 for Java7. However, I would like to propose ridding ourselves of
Tomcat entirely and embedding a network stack such as Netty (http://netty.io)
with a servlet bridge. We have one JSP in the system that generates JSON
resources. It could be easily eliminated with a simple servlet
+1 Sounds like a good idea to move forward to 1.7.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 05:36 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> > However at a certain point we should start to advice people to run
> > CloudStack on java 1.7 as there are no more public secu
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 05:36 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> However at a certain point we should start to advice people to run
> CloudStack on java 1.7 as there are no more public security updates to
> java 1.6.
Previously: http://markmail.org/thread/s2dzo5ib7ox46l4f
> So summarized proposal, make
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Back in February 2013 Oracle announced the end of public support for java
> 1.6 already. Today we are still using java 1.6 as our supported platform.
> I've been looking at the next generation of linux distributions (well
Hey everyone,
Back in February 2013 Oracle announced the end of public support for java 1.6
already. Today we are still using java 1.6 as our supported platform. I've been
looking at the next generation of linux distributions (well mainly at Fedora
18, which will probably become RHEL 7) and tho
12 matches
Mail list logo
