Re: [DISCUSS] Extending Marvin Smoketest Suite

Hi all, Furthermore I think there’s a way to slice through the tests and pick up those you need more efficiently. As a first step we can work with the test attributes and introduce a “quick-test” tag. This tag would be used on tests that are vital and really high level, like for example CRUD

Re: [DISCUSS] Extending Marvin Smoketest Suite

Thanks Will, There’s big set of projects tests in the component suite, I’ll add that in the the task and review what tests would be good to go in the smoke test suite. Please shout if you explicitly need something added. Thanks, Bobby. boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chand

Re: [DISCUSS] Extending Marvin Smoketest Suite

I would like to see better testing of 'projects' as well, it is almost entirely untested. *Will Stevens* CTO On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Boris Stoyanov wrote: > Hi all, > > I’ve started up this improvement, which is to extend Marvin smoketests > with some more tests

[DISCUSS] Extending Marvin Smoketest Suite

Hi all, I’ve started up this improvement, which is to extend Marvin smoketests with some more tests. I’ve indicated a few tests from the component tests that I think would be really good to have into smoketests, like for example Usage tests ( we don’t have any currently). https://issues.apache.