I would like to see better testing of 'projects' as well, it is almost entirely untested.
*Will Stevens* CTO <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > wrote: > Hi all, > > I’ve started up this improvement, which is to extend Marvin smoketests > with some more tests. I’ve indicated a few tests from the component tests > that I think would be really good to have into smoketests, like for example > Usage tests ( we don’t have any currently). > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9989 > > > Here’s a list of items that I think are suitable candidates: > test_accounts.py - There are no tests for accounts/users in the current > suite > test_host_maintenance.py - We have received reports for multiple failures > around moving VMs away from a Host set for Maintenance. > test_regions.py - there are no tests for this in the current suite > test_usage.py - No tests and this is quite vital to public and private > cloud providers, CloudStack users rely on this usage metrics and we should > be testing this on a daily basis. > > In the JIRA ticket I’ve added up more details against each group of tests > since there are some with problems at this stage. > > Can you guys please review and add more areas that you would like to be > smoke tested as part of each PR in the community repo? > > Thanks > Boris Stoyanov > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > >
