Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-21 Thread Boris Stoyanov
I strongly agree with this. There should be at least 2 LGTMs and a proof it's being tested(logs, pictures etc..) Bobby. On 2.10.19, 14:37, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: LS, in the past we had set a set of rules in the community under which PR could be merged. I want to reiterate them h

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-20 Thread Andrija Panic
>> to (and doesn't do anything that it's not supposed to). It looks to me >> that sometimes passing regression tests is seen as the change has been >> tested. IMO regression test passing is a prerequisite of a PR being ready >> for anyone other than the author(s) to st

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
; see Rohit's last point. [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3580 -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland > Sent: 02 October 2019 12:37 > To: dev > Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification > > LS, > in the past we had set a set of rules i

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-14 Thread Rohit Yadav
, 2019 13:47 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification BUMP. Hey Guys, We have a lot of new people in the community these days; this seems like an important exercise to ensure that we're all on the same page, whethe

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-10 Thread Andrija Panic
lly, we have to catch mistakes where we can to make > CloudStack as good as we can to keep people using it. > > > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com > > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > &

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-10 Thread Sven Vogel
l Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Sven Vogel > Sent: 10 October 2019 10:48 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification > &

RE: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-10 Thread Paul Angus
sing it. paul.an...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Sven Vogel Sent: 10 October 2019 10:48 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-10 Thread Sven Vogel
>> >> >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Daan Hoogland >> Sent: 02 October 2019 12:37 &g

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-10 Thread Andrija Panic
ue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland > Sent: 02 October 2019 12:37 > To: dev > Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification > > LS, &g

RE: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-10 Thread Paul Angus
ctober 2019 12:37 To: dev Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification LS, in the past we had set a set of rules in the community under which PR could be merged. I want to reiterate them here as it seems we are kind of slacking. Please chime in if there are any issues or omissions: For a

[DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-02 Thread Daan Hoogland
LS, in the past we had set a set of rules in the community under which PR could be merged. I want to reiterate them here as it seems we are kind of slacking. Please chime in if there are any issues or omissions: For a PR to be merged it has to adhere to the following conditions: - In any case -- A