On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> In response to Brocade I see your response
>
> "feature should be done (in it's branch) by 19th july. merging and fixing
> issues may take to mid august" that essentially means feature freeze (cutting
> the branch) by mid august
it
m: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:07 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
>
> I saw you mentioning mid august as well so there is some confusion
>
&g
I saw you mentioning mid august as well so there is some confusion
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 1:52 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
&g
rom: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:45 AM
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
>>
>> Seeing what objections there might be I want to amend my proposal to
>>
>> 1. move forw
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:45 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
>
> Seeing what objections there might be I want to amend my proposal to
> Daan
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Ritu Sabharwal
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Daan for the clarification!
>>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl.
; >> flames? other thoughts?
> >> Daan
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Ritu Sabharwal
> >> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Daan for the clarification!
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-
> >> > From: D
gt; >>
>> >> Thanks & Regards,
>> >> Ritu S.
>> >>
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 5:26 AM
>> >> To: dev
>> &
; > -Original Message-
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 1:56 PM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
> >
> > What I mean is that to prevent the date of
wrote:
> Thanks Daan for the clarification!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 1:56 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
>
> What I mean is that to
Thanks Daan for the clarification!
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 1:56 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
What I mean is that to prevent the date of oct '14 moving we ne
ed from Oct '14 to a forward date?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ritu S.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 5:26 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: [ACS45][ACS50][PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
&
[PROPOSAL] move forward feature freeze
LS,
When I seeing once again our release schedule shift, I think we have no option
but to move feature freeze for the next release forward.
This is the only way it seems we can reduce the complexity of the total sum of
changes. Therefore it is the only w
LS,
When I seeing once again our release schedule shift, I think we have
no option but to move feature freeze for the next release forward.
This is the only way it seems we can reduce the complexity of the
total sum of changes. Therefore it is the only way we can prevent
lapsing even more in time
14 matches
Mail list logo
