Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2006
Code LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1996
In the travis ci the tests are failing it could be because of timeout. But
when I run some of the test locally it is passing.
The same test test_invalid_gw_nm is failing in travis ci
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
@ProjectMoon Jenkins and CI is passed, Can you please give LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1996
@koushik-das I have updated for your review comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
Jenkins got timed out. I am force pushing again to trigger jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110854129
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/CommandSetupHelper.java ---
@@ -848,13 +849,38 @@ public int compare(final PublicIpAddress o1, final
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110854097
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4920to41000.sql ---
@@ -230,5 +230,11 @@ JOIN `cloud`.`vm_snapshots` s ON
(s.service_offering_id = o.id AND s.vm_id = v.i
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110854055
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4920to41000.sql ---
@@ -230,5 +230,11 @@ JOIN `cloud`.`vm_snapshots` s ON
(s.service_offering_id = o.id AND s.vm_id = v.i
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110818988
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
---
@@ -625,15 +627,20 @@ protected
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1996
It seems there is issue in CI due to that test are failing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2018
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110112007
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/CommandSetupHelper.java ---
@@ -848,13 +849,37 @@ public int compare(final PublicIpAddress o1, final
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r11089
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/CommandSetupHelper.java ---
@@ -848,13 +849,37 @@ public int compare(final PublicIpAddress o1, final
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110082664
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java
---
@@ -1764,9 +1765,12 @@ protected
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110082657
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
---
@@ -625,15 +627,20 @@ protected
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2018
@wido
In the patch it can be observed that it is ("-A FIREWALL_%s DROP" % )
running without '-j' and it is not caught. There is duplicate rule due this the
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1997
@DaanHoogland In the case of VM_POWER_STATE handler, if PowerOff or
PowerReportMissing state is encountered,
handlePowerOffReportWithNoPendingJobsOnVM() is called. If the VM is already in
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1917
There are two LGTMs and there are not test failures in the test results. So
marking tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1997
@ramkatru I am not sure about Daan comments.
The tests results are positive.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1996
@rhtyd Once this PR got the LGTMs, I can rebase it on 4.9. Can you please
review this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2018
CLOUDSTACK-9848: Added exit status checking for the iptables commands
Added the checking exist status of iptables command.
On exception return error so that it will be populated to
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
@ustcweizhou I will add disable and CLOUDSTACK-9413 in new feature.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1993
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1993
@borisstoyanov Updated with jira ticket
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1997
CLOUDSTACK-9208: Assertion Error in VM_POWER_STATE handler- Fixed
This PR closes PR #1307
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1996
CLOUDSTACK-9099: SecretKey is returned from the APIs
This PR closes the PR #1152
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1993
Fail to deploy VM instance when use.system.public.ips=false
This PR closes PR #907
Reproducing steps:
1. Create an account
2. Dedicate public ip range to this account
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1965
Code changes LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1970
Code LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
Two LGTMs and no test failures from cloudmonger test results.
@ustcweizhou waited for your comments for this, I am putting the mergeready
tag. If you have anything to bring up let me know
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
@ProjectMoon Can you please review it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1991
Updated the patch. Tested it no issues found.
Please review this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1991#discussion_r104414236
--- Diff: scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vmops ---
@@ -1267,9 +1267,9 @@ def cache_ipset_keyword():
type = getIpsetType()
tmpname
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1991
I am testing it again. Please wait till I update
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1991#discussion_r104405081
--- Diff: scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vmops ---
@@ -1267,9 +1267,9 @@ def cache_ipset_keyword():
type = getIpsetType()
tmpname
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1991
CLOUDSTACK-9821: Fixed issue in deploying vm in basic zone
Fixed issue in deploying vm in basic zone.
There is issue in ipset command with xenserver 6.5. In util.pread2 ipset
and -N is
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
@ProjectMoon
I have today this PR after rebasing latest master. I did not observe the
add:true for the removed ip.
Here is output from the ips.json and ip addr show output
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1917#discussion_r103897727
--- Diff: engine/components-api/src/com/cloud/network/IpAddressManager.java
---
@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
"If true, when account has dedi
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1866
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1866#discussion_r103863373
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade4920to41000.java
---
@@ -53,6 +55,7 @@ public boolean supportsRollingUpgrade
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
@ProjectMoon The ip issue can be worked as separate ticket/PR. It is an
isolated issue, it is not having any dependency with this PR. So we will get
this PR in and create a separate ticket
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
@ProjectMoon
I have seen the issue of ips.json having the "add:true" while I am testing
this PR. I tested this PR by manually removing the ip or setting add to false.
Also I t
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1886
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1883
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1866
I tested manually test_02_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false
Failed. It worked for me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1824
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1886#discussion_r103136343
--- Diff: core/src/com/cloud/network/resource/TrafficSentinelResource.java
---
@@ -228,6 +239,7 @@ private DirectNetworkUsageAnswer
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
Jenkins and travis are failing because of its internal failures.
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1922
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/843
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
@ustcweizhou changes for kvm were in new file. It is missed while
commiting, added now. Thanks for catching.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1883#discussion_r102888327
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -377,11 +377,16 @@ protected void addAccountToNetwork(final long
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1883
There are no marvin tests available for this. The unique mac address
supposed for the two different deployments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1883#discussion_r102651320
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -377,11 +377,16 @@ protected void addAccountToNetwork(final long
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1883#discussion_r102651284
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -377,11 +377,16 @@ protected void addAccountToNetwork(final long
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1883#discussion_r102649918
--- Diff: utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java ---
@@ -83,9 +83,19 @@
public final static int
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/843
@rhtyd
This is basic zone related changes. In the above results failures are not
related to the changes.
Can you please review the changes once.
---
If your project is set up for it
GitHub user jayapalu reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1922
CLOUDSTACK-9757: Fixed issue in traffic from additional public subnet
Acquire ip from additional public subnet and configure nat on that ip.
After this pick any from that network and
Github user jayapalu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1922
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1922#discussion_r102432766
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/CommandSetupHelper.java ---
@@ -703,6 +722,10 @@ public void createVpcAssociatePublicIPCommands(final
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
There are not failed test cases on CI run.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1824#discussion_r102192868
--- Diff: scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vmops ---
@@ -232,28 +233,50 @@ def deleteFile(session, args):
return txt
+#using
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/843
@rhtyd nethash is supported in xenserver 6.2 but the problem is when
configure /32 cidr giving the error ' Out of range cidr `10.147.52.30/32'
specified'. Please see the bug f
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1885
Failed test cases are not related to this PR code changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user jayapalu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1874
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1917
Travis CI test_outofbandmanagement is failing which is not related to this
PR changes. It seems there is problem with the test case.
@rhtyd Do you have any idea on this ?
Running
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1886
@rafaelweingartner Traffic sentinel supports the post request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1379
These scripts CI tests are not needed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1379
These scripts are for config drive feature. Deploy vm in shared network
without services then vm with config drive will be deployed.
Place these scripts in vm template to set VM password
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1379#discussion_r101223451
--- Diff: setup/bindir/cloud-set-guest-sshkey-configdrive.in ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+#
+# Init file for SSH Public Keys
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1379#discussion_r101223426
--- Diff: setup/bindir/cloud-set-guest-sshkey-configdrive.in ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+#
+# Init file for SSH Public Keys
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
PR#1741 is closed. So closed this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jayapalu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/843
Rebased against master. This PR changes are for basic zone. CI runs test
cases for advanced zone.
So tested manually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1885#discussion_r100985099
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/IpAddressManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -460,6 +460,12 @@ boolean checkIfIpAssocRequired(Network network,
boolean
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1939
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/858
created new #PR 1939 for this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1939
CLOUDSTACK-8886: Limitations is listUsageRecords output, listUsageRecâ¦
As @kansal is inactive created new branch and raised the PR. This is
continuation of PR#858
https://github.com
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/843#discussion_r100766384
--- Diff: scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vmops ---
@@ -356,18 +356,25 @@ def allow_egress_traffic(session):
return '
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill I have tested this PR with systemvm template with strongswan
installed long back. The s2s vpn worked fine.
LGTM from my side.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1922
CLOUDSTACK-9757: Fixed issue in traffic from additional public subnet
Acquire ip from additional public subnet and configure nat on that ip.
After this pick any from that network and
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1917
CLOUDSTACK-9756: Configure to ignore the ipassoc failure
On failure of ip assoc in back end (In VR), added config option to ignore
or not to ignore failure. Using this failures won'
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1450
@ProjectMoon
Added the new PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 for
addressing missing issues in this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving ips on interface
FIxed issue in disabling multiple static nat simultaneously.
This patch has taken changes from the PR 1450 and
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1450
@ProjectMoon
I am working on it. I will be updating the fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1450
I tested this patch with below steps. It is not removing the ip addresses
on the VR interface. Some times observed that even there is one ip with static
nat but the interface got removed
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1886
CLOUDSTACK-9728: Fixed traffic sentinel HTTP 414 error response
Url generated by CCP to request traffic sentinel for usage stats is too
long causing HTTP 414 Request-URI Too Long error
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1885
CLOUDSTACK-9724: Fixed missing additional public ip on tier network wâ¦
In VPC tier network acquire an ip and configure the PF service on it. VR
now will have the two ip addresses on the
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1883
CLOUDSTACK-9723: Enable unique mac address across the zones
Enable unique mac address across different deployments and networks.
If there two networks in two different deployment zones
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/838
Code changes are fine. Test results are there
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1876
CLOUDSTACK-9715: Update somaxconn value to default value
Updated the somaxconn value to detault value 65535
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1874
CLOUDSTACK-9711: Fixed error reporting while adding vpn user
If configuring vpn user in one of the network fails the failure is ignored,
failure should be shown in API response.
You can
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use the correct the â¦
Updated the vm ip fetch task to use the seperate thread executor
Also fixed in this
If a vm with iso
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1866
Advanced isolated network egress destination cidr support added
Added the destination cidr support for the advanced zone isolated network
egress rule.
With this now user can control both
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1782
Rebased on 4.9 and added changes for @ustcweizhou
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
@rhtyd It is already rebased on 4.9 and also added changes for
@ustcweizhou comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1782
@ustcweizhou
I am updating code for the LB rules as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1824
CLOUDSTACK-9657: Fixed security group ipset issues with long vm name
ipset set name max length allowed is 31 char. If the vm name has longer
name then the trimming of set has done in this
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
rebased it on 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@rhtyd
While testing this feature public ip order change on reboot issue blocked
this.
My suggestion is that public ip out of order is different issue. If vpn
functionalities working
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
