RE: [ANNOUNCE] Change of Apache CloudStack PMC Chair

Congratulations Hugo! -Original Message- From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Change of Apache CloudStack PMC Chair Chip - your balanced viewpoint has kept ACS moving forward in leaps

RE: Dev/Test Environment

I assumed it was then just falling back >to full virtualization, but perhaps not. > >I'll be at Hosting Con at the end of June, and may not be able to swing the >cloudstack conference, but I'll take you up on that the next chance I get. > > >On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:3

RE: Dev/Test Environment

Lol, We are just using different terms, haha. I call Hardware assisted virtualization HAV, and separate it from paravirtualization(software wrapper). That's where the confusion is. I agree with what you're saying, Just not used to people referring to tier 2 HAV as paravirtualization support. I b

RE: AS4.1 with VMware System VMs

> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: RE: AS4.1 with VMware System VMs >> >> Switch controller to IDE in vmware to see if it helps, just to confirm >> its controller related. >> >> Regards >> ilya >> >> > -Original Message- >> >

RE: Dev/Test Environment

Xen runs pretty well in Para-Virt mode, I'll give it that. >-Original Message- >From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 11:49 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: Re: Dev/Test Environment > >On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:44:52PM +, Sohe

RE: Dev/Test Environment

possible to nest with Para-Virtualization but you should not expect any form of 'usable' tier 2 guest instances. The overhead on the CPU by that point without pDMA is insane. When modeling something as complex as a cloud using nested virtualization, you really want HAV. KELCEY

RE: AS4.1 with VMware System VMs

rst time for everything :-) ) > >It'd be 'simplest' if CloudStack could specify an IDE disk upon creation though >wouldn't it? > >Regards, > >Paul Angus >S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 >paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >-Original Mess

RE: AS4.1 with VMware System VMs

r to IDE in vmware to see if it helps, just to confirm its >controller related. > >Regards >ilya > >> -Original Message- >> From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] >> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 1:41 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.

RE: AS4.1 with VMware System VMs

This comment made my day. (Side note, VMware only claims easy provisioning functionality with RHEL derivatives and Ubuntu) You could re-pack your system VM with the needed virtual scsi driver support I think? >-Original Message- >From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >Se

RE: AS4.1 with VMware System VMs

Yeah, You need to edit the parameters for the system VM in vCenter. Not pretty, but the default since 5.0 has been virtualized scsi. http://www.backbone.gr/media/backbone_symbol1.pngKelcey Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect www.backbonetechnolo

RE: New Committer: Clayton Weise

ise > >You know what this mean. Now I no longer have an excuse as to why the >documentation we've put on the wiki can't be added to the official >documentation for CS :) > >-Original Message- >From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] &

RE: New Committer: Clayton Weise

It's about time! Lol. Now I have an official partner in crime >-Original Message- >From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:53 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Cc: cwe...@iswest.net >Subject: New Committer: Clayton Weise > >The Project

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congrats! >-Original Message- >From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:51 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > >Well done Prasanna, > >On Apr 22, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" >wrote: > >> Con

RE: [DISCUSS] labels for cloudstack university and GSoC

I like Joe's proposition of potentially housing the [ACSEDU] tag under marketing. I do agree that [GSoC] is 'Dev' related and belongs on that list. >-Original Message- >From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 10:35 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Su

RE: [DISCUSS] labels for cloudstack university and GSoC

I think the concern here was in adding further volume to the dev list, which should be primarily about just that, 'Development'. And EDU could be an opt-in list. EDU is a wonderful initiative, however the more non-dev related content we poor into dev, the more we pester the core development populat

RE: [EDU] CloudStack University

I have some material I could fashion into a course on advanced networking. Let me get that rolling. -kd >-Original Message- >From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:27 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject:

RE: wiki.cloudstack.org redirect to cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK ?

Would be nice, I have dealt with 2 issues of confusion by users today alone :) -kd   >-Original Message- >From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 12:53 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: wiki.cloudstack.org redirect to >cwiki.apache.o

RE: New Committer: Ilya Musayev

It's about time :) Congrats! -kd >-Original Message- >From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:36 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: New Committer: Ilya Musayev > >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has

RE: [DISCUSS] create a general@ mailing list?

I agree completely with your statement David. -kd >-Original Message- >From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 3:36 PM >To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] create a general@ mailing list? > >On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Chi