I agree completely with your statement David. -kd
>-----Original Message----- >From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 3:36 PM >To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] create a general@ mailing list? > >On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Chip Childers ><chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >> I've noticed that some of the projects separate discussions between >> dev and general administrative items via a general@ and a dev@ list. >> For example, the last email I sent was about project meta-data. It's >> not specifically about developing cloudstack, but about managing our >> community activities. >> >> Does anyone think it makes sense to break that type of discussion out >> into a general@ list? > >So I unclear on this. > >All committers are expected to be on -dev. > >Now, because administrivia is happening on general@ all committers will also >need to be on that list. So I don't see a lot of benefit to moving that traffic off of >dev@. I also don't see adminitrstrative stuff taking up that much bandwidth. I >understand marketing being separate, though I think we've seen a number of >'missed messages' >already from that. Dev@ is where contributors 'live' - so metadata about the >project seems a fit there - or am I missing something? > >--David
