t branches/ versions
Thanks,
Jason
On Tue May 27, 2025 at 3:16 PM EDT, João Jandre Paraquetti wrote:
Hi Jason,
If it is a bug/enchancement, I advise you to submit it to the oldest LTS
branch that is affected by the bug (or that is compatible with the
enhancement). You can check the
Hi Jason,
If it is a bug/enchancement, I advise you to submit it to the oldest LTS
branch that is affected by the bug (or that is compatible with the
enhancement). You can check the LTS list here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
If it is a new feature you should su
Congratulations, Swen!
On 3/18/25 05:57, Daan Hoogland wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Swen Brüseke (sbrueseke) to become a committer and
we are pleased to announce that they have accepted.
Swen is the CEO of proio, a cloudstack using company and
Congratulations Fabricio!!!
On 2/13/25 06:28, Daan Hoogland wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited
Fabricio to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they
have accepted.
Please join us in welcoming Fabricio to their new role and
responsib
Congratulations Jithin!!
Best regards,
João
On 2/5/25 10:18, Daan Hoogland wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Jithin Raju (rajujith) to become a committer and
we are pleased to announce that they have accepted.
Jithin has been a long time CloudStac
Hello Suresh, all
I'm +1 with you as RM for 4.21.
Regarding the schedule, for the project's standards, it is an early
release with only 6 months apart from the last minor (our average is
around 9 months if I'm not mistaken). However, I'm for it, I believe
that a shorter release cycle would be
Hi Daan, All
I'm +1 on releasing 4.19.2 on January, it already has a good amount of
fixes and version 4.19 could receive some love.
If you need any help with the release, I volunteer myself to be your
assistant. I just have to say that on January I'll be on vacation, but I
can help you until
Parabéns, Alexandre!
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 12/4/24 21:28, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please join me in congratulating Alexandre Mattioli for becoming a member
of the CloudStack PMC.
Congratulations, Alex! :)
Thanks,
Mike
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mike-tutkowski-5880286/
Hello, Ivet
I believe I have sent you the quote and the picture some time ago, maybe
the email got lost?
I'll re-send it to you.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 11/27/24 11:22, Ivet Petrova wrote:
Hi Joao,
I would be happy to help on the blog post for the ACS blog. Do you have some
draft?
Rem
Hi, all
Sorry for not realizing CCC was happening now. I'll be extending the
voting for another 120 hours, so the voting will end at Wednesday next
week.
Enjoy the event!
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 11/20/24 09:16, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Indeed, thanks for the effort! I'm on my way to
Hi all,
I'm ending the voting. We have critical issues which are being worked
on. When those are addressed, we may have another voting.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 10/23/24 05:31, Jithin Raju wrote:
+1
Tested the following:
Instance deploy, expunge
Volume attach
Created VPC
Site to site V
Hi Wei,
Apparently there was... We'll fix it and I'll create an RC2 soon.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 10/11/24 10:16, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Hi João, and Daan,
I think there was something wrong in the forward-merge or branches.
For example, I can find the file Qcow2HeaderField.java in 4.18.2.4 and
Contratulations Suresh!!
On 9/18/24 07:51, Rohit Yadav wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Suresh Anaparti to become a PMC member and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Suresh has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make t
n Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:34 PM João Jandre Paraquetti
wrote:
Hi All,
Time for a little status update.
We have fixed/tested/merged 20 Issues and 114 PRs in the 4.20.0.0
milestone [1]. Currently, we have 185 open items in the 4.20.0.0
milestone. Of these, we have:
- 0 Blocker/Critical issues
- 4
b.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/30
On 8/13/24 14:49, João Jandre Paraquetti wrote:
Hi All,
Time for a little status update.
We have fixed/tested/merged 15 Issues and 107 PRs in the 4.20.0.0
milestone [1]. Currently, we have 188 open items in the 4.20.0.0
milestone. Of these, we have:
Hi All,
Time for a little status update.
We have fixed/tested/merged 15 Issues and 107 PRs in the 4.20.0.0
milestone [1]. Currently, we have 188 open items in the 4.20.0.0
milestone. Of these, we have:
- 0 Blocker/Critical issues
- 3 Major issues
- 17 Minor issues
- 40 enhancement issues/req
ts.
Thanks,
Abhisar
________
From: João Jandre Paraquetti
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2024 12:24 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ;
dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Update the 4.20.0.0 release schedule
Hi Suresh, all
I agree that we should release 4.19.1.0 before 4.20.0.0, also, the
I agree with Rohit, EL7 is long past its due date and choosing to keep
supporting it is a risk for the project. I believe we should stop
recommending this dated OS for new environments now and start removing
support on the next major versions (e.g. 5.0) . Also, +1 on not
recommending the use of
Hi Suresh, all
I agree that we should release 4.19.1.0 before 4.20.0.0, also, there are
some features missing on 4.20.0.0 still that I'd like to get in, so more
time wouldn't hurt.
That being said, here is the updated schedule I propose:
- On the third week of August, we freeze the main bran
Congratunations Kiran!!
On 4/9/24 02:45, Rohit Yadav wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Kiran Chavala (kiranchavala) to become a committer and
we are pleased to announce that they have accepted.
Kiran has been a long time CloudStack contributor and h
gland wrote:
ok, if it is a regression (introduction of a bug on formerly working
functionality) It would mean a blocker and we can easily respin a new
RC. What do you think @João Jandre Paraquetti ?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:43 AM Rene Peinthor wrote:
Probably neither a blocker or critical, ass
one
critical PR remains open.
After the last critical PR is merged, may we proceed with the release
process, or is there still any security issue that should be addressed?
Best Regards,
João Jandre
On 3/13/24 14:35, João Jandre Paraquetti wrote:
Hi Wei, all,
Considering that there are some
Hi all,
I had posted this message on another thread, but following Rohit's
advice I've decided to create a new one for it. That being said, I have
another proposal for the versioning scheme. Instead of dropping the "X"
on our X.Y.Z.N, we can set a fixed schedule (that can be further
discussed
Hi all,
I know that this discussion has cooled off, but I think it's still
extremely relevant for the future of ACS. That being said, I have
another proposal for the versioning scheme. Instead of dropping the "X"
on our X.Y.Z.N, we can set a fixed schedule (that can be further
discussed) for
-Wei
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 1:21 PM João Jandre Paraquetti
wrote:
Hi Wei,
Are you referring to #8729? If so, it was marked as critical (a few
minutes ago); therefore, as I announced yesterday: "From now onward, we
will only accept critical/blocker issues or any stabilization fixes&quo
Please hold on.
-Wei
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:19 PM João Jandre Paraquetti
wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to announce the code freeze of the 4.18 branch now.
From now onward, we will only accept critical/blocker issues or any
stabilization fixes. We have 70 open items in the 4.18.2.0 miles
nt in 4.18?
Regards.
Regards.
____
From: João Jandre Paraquetti
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 6:18:34 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.2.0
I think we can push a week or two earlier on the proposed schedule, it
would look something
Congratulations, Vishesh!!
On 2/26/24 11:05, Daan Hoogland wrote:
users and devs,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Vishesh Jindal to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution
.
Regards.
____
From: João Jandre Paraquetti
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 6:18:34 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.2.0
I think we can push a week or two earlier on the proposed schedule, it
would look something like this:
- From no
Hi all,
As some of you might already be aware, ACS version 4.20 will bring our
logging library, log4j, from version 1.2 to 2.19. This change will bring
us a number of benefits, such as:
* Async Loggers - performance similar to logging switched off
* Custom log levels
* Automatically rel
Hi all,
I agree that our current versioning schema doesn't make much sense, as
"minors" introduce pretty big features; even backward incompatibilities
are introduced in minor versions sometimes.
As the current plan is to have 4.20 by June, I think we should stick to
it and still have the nex
er to even say end of Jan, and target release
in Feb 2024.
Regards.
From: João Jandre Paraquetti
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 23:32
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.2.0
Hi all,
As suggested on the 4.20.0.0 discussion thread (see
BDRAFT%5D+How+to+Become+a+Committer
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/%5BDRAFT%5D+How+to+Become+a+PMC+Member
Regards.
________
From: João Jandre Paraquetti
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 17:57
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.20 p
Hi all,
As suggested on the 4.20.0.0 discussion thread (see
https://lists.apache.org/thread/nyoddmwydz2t59hsfs7gf0vozlf7n434), I'd
like to propose the release of version 4.18.2.0 with myself as the RM,
here's a rough timeline:
- From now till the second week of February (2 months): accept b
Hello all,
We have quite a few new interesting features prepared for 4.20; there's
the log4j PR, that we plan on merging as soon as 4.19 is released. We
also have a few big PRs to be opened for 4.20:
- Refactoring of the quota UI;
- New feature to allow users to create custom UI themes and app
Hello all,
As someone who has worked a lot on logging in this project, I feel like
a set of log guidelines are a good addition. I generally agree with
Daan's ideas; however, I think that the error level was oversimplified.
As Daan already said, there are two main reasons for error logs: "the
Sure, Daniel
PR #7895 is currently in draft as we need to do some more tests.
However, the intention is to enable users to configure the DB connection
URI directly through `db.properties` file. These are the tests that have
been done so far with ACS without this PR changeset:
Using the curre
/bylaws.html
Regards.
From: João Jandre Paraquetti
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 01:36
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ;
dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2
Hi all,
This voting has been going on for quite some time already. In the
simple to fix), I am
+1
on
the proposal.
Best regards,
Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/261j7m0p5mr4q7yclvo49mwhkxz4yov2
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 1:28 PM João Jandre Paraquetti <
j...@scclouds.com.br>
wrote:
Hello guys,
I am opening this voting
work.
Best regards,
Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 4:10 AM Abhishek Kumar <
shwst...@apache.org
wrote:
Great work.
Though I feel this is a 5.0 change. I agree with Wei that this
would
create
too much overhead for upcoming releases. 4.18 was pushed ahead
a
few
months
Hello guys,
I am opening this voting thread as result of the discussion in thread
"ACS upgrade to Log4J2 version 2.19"[1].
The voting aims to continue the efforts and conclude the upgrade of the
ACS logging library to Log4j2 through PR 7131[2]; merge the PR as soon
as possible and provide wa
.19 RM and conduct/execute all of the work.
Best regards,
Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 4:10 AM Abhishek Kumar
wrote:
Great work.
Though I feel this is a 5.0 change. I agree with Wei that this
would
create
too much overhead for upcoming releases. 4.18 was pushed
In PR #7131 (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131) I have
proposed to normalize ACS's loggers, and more importantly, upgrade the
library log4j to log4j2 version 2.19.
Log4j2 has a lot of features that could offer benefits to ACS:
* Async Loggers - performance similar to logging swit
+1
Tested VM creation, migration, deletion, scaling, VM restart, VM
snapshot and restore from snapshot.
Tested volume creation, attach, detach, migration, deletion, volume
snapshot and restore from snapshot.
Tested registering a k8s ISO and creating a k8s cluster using the
community ISO 1.24.0
44 matches
Mail list logo
