Sanjay,
Can you check the logs for the routers?
Also check if these routers are on a specific host as opposed to
functioning routers.
Your description is a bit vague still to give conclusive answers so
more investigation is needed.
regards,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:39 AM Sanjay Kumar wrote:
es of
PMC members.
Please join us in welcoming Pearl to their new role in our
project!
Daan Hoogland
On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
thank you both, @Nicolas Vazquez we've got your back.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 9:56 AM Nux wrote:
>
> Thanks Daniel and congratulation Nicolas!
>
>
>
> On 2025-03-26 06:25, Suresh Kumar Anaparti wrote:
> > Thanks Daniel for your efforts/contributions last year.
> >
> > Congratulations Nicolas!
> >
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
Is delighted to announce that Pearl Dsilva has joined the PMC!
Pearl has been active in the project for +- 5 years, and did so in
different capacities. She's worked on numerous extensions like the
new nsx integration and the tungsten int
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Swen Brüseke (sbrueseke) to become a committer and
we are pleased to announce that they have accepted.
Swen is the CEO of proio, a cloudstack using company and has been
involved in CloudStack as a contributor for a couple of
Looks like you want to make use of static NAT in either an isolated or a VPC.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:47 AM TechnologyRss
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> My created zone is Adv without SG enabled, So I needed a domain user to
> create a vm instance and can assign a public ip for the created vm
> instanc
The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) are pleased to announce that
travel assistance applications for Community over Code Asia 2025 are now
open!
We will be supporting Community over Code Asia, Beijing, China
July 25th to the 27th 2025.
TAC exists to help those that would like to attend Communit
https://download.cloudstack.org/el/8/
- https://download.cloudstack.org/el/9/
- https://download.cloudstack.org/suse/15
- https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu/dists/
- https://www.shapeblue.com/packages/
On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC,
Daan Hoogland
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
is delighted to announce that João has joined the PMC!
João was the 4.20 Rm and has been contributing for several years both
in code and in reviews and functional discussion. He is based in
Brazil.
The PMC - Project Management Committee
Hello all, we have
+7 +1 votes (of which 4 binding)
0 +0
0 -1
The vote carries. I will do the release (opening 4.19 for merges again),
create the announcement, upload packages, etc. over the coming days.
Thanks everybody for participating,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 9:38 AM Daan Hoogland wrote
s
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Rene Peinthor
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 21:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users
> Subj
en lacking in Cloudstack. Malwares are getting
> more complex and smarter these days...
>
> Regards,
> Bryan
> On 21 Feb 2025 at 7:24 PM +0800, Daan Hoogland ,
> wrote:
> > sounds good Bryan,
> > Can you create an issue for it (and tag it with gsoc and gsoc2025)
side.
>
> Regards,
> Bryan
> On 18 Feb 2025 at 2:06 AM +0800, Daan Hoogland ,
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 6:45 PM Bryan Tiang
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Daan,
> > >
> > > Are there guidelines on what could be suggested for GSoC?
&
packages are ready now
at http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.19.2.0-RC4/
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 9:38 AM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.2.0 release candidate, with the following
> artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
Hi All,
I've created a 4.19.2.0 release candidate, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.0-RC20250220T0932
Commit: 4e321d43565951a3856923d680976b8cd4eb1b46
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at
ed three older issues and a new one.
Select the label gsoc. Any others are welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Bryan
> On 17 Feb 2025 at 9:01 PM +0800, Daan Hoogland , wrote:
> > Not to exclude anybody: (note that for the following you have to be a
> > committer to be eligi
Hi all,
Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2025 has already been announced and the
timeline is available on this link:
https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline.
Obviously the submission of organisations deadline has already been
past, but Apache is in the mix. To increase our chances a
,
> upgraded from the 4.19.1.3 version.
>
> Best regards,
> Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves (bernardodemarco)
>
> Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2025 às 16:57, Rohit Yadav <
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> escreveu:
>
> > Thanks Daan, it was in nested/in-line em
/4.19.2.0-RC2/el8/4.19/>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
> From: Rene Peinthor
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 8:02:36 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 RC3
>
> +1
>
> Did basic tests and the integration tests
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited
Fabricio to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they
have accepted.
Please join us in welcoming Fabricio to their new role and
responsibility in our project community.
Daan Hoogland,
On behalf of the
as promised,...
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 5:31 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.2.0 release candidate, with the following
> artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.
Hi All,
I've created a 4.19.2.0 release candidate, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.0-RC20250212T1722
Commit: 7f0eed39419b6076eed8db39a8cd3be326a49a2d
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at
I just noticed another mistake. I am closing this vote and will start a 3rd
one soon.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 3:28 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> please not that I forgot to update the commit-id, this should be
> f05fa27bfd843c6fea7b4a2d9e5c62ee21d57019
>
> Hi All,
>
> I
please not that I forgot to update the commit-id, this should be
f05fa27bfd843c6fea7b4a2d9e5c62ee21d57019
Hi All,
I've created a 4.19.2.0 release candidate, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.0-RC20250211T1518Com
Hi All,
I've created a 4.19.2.0 release candidate, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.0-RC20250211T1518Commit:
5c6b04f6bfcca575492e97f32a6d1d23b49bdffc
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at th
<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/10212>
)
Also I am aware of a possible regression and investigating this with a
colleague.
Please keep replying to me with comments and questions, on list or
privately.
regards,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 3:49 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> LS,
>
>
LS,
There has been some confusion because in my opinion we should be able to
release ad-hoc and often. It seems most of you disagree and are waiting for
the maximum of PRs being merged. I have marked any PR that I think should
not be considered for 4.19.2 as part of milestone 4.19.3[1] right now,
I am closing this vote.
The vote does not pass by lack of quorum.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 9:28 AM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/c
sorry for misspelling your name in the subject Jithin... :(
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:18 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Jithin Raju (rajujith) to become a committer and
> we are pleased to announce that they have
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Jithin Raju (rajujith) to become a committer and
we are pleased to announce that they have accepted.
Jithin has been a long time CloudStack contributor and has created
lots of issues on Github and tested PRs. Being a committe
l going to be PRs and issues open for the 4.19 branch. If there is the
general consensus that people want to have a new RC I will certainly make
one. Not at the moment though because an instability crept into the branch
after RC0.
Best regards,
> Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves (bernardodemarco
this seems like a reasonable schedule @Suresh Anaparti
, thanks for taking this on. You have my
support.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:19 PM Suresh Kumar Anaparti <
sureshanapa...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to propose and put myself forward as the release manager for 4.21.0
> if there ar
LS,
I've had no reactions. I can say "no news is good news" or be a pessimist.
Did anybody at all have a look yet? The 72 hours are way gone, and we had a
weekend as well.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:52 AM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> LS,
> I uploaded convenienc
elease. Not speaking about
> features just stability.
>
> Is 4.19.3 the stable release or is the 4.20.0
>
> I saw patches and RC for the 4.19.X.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Tata Y.
>
>
>
> > On Jan 27, 2025, at 8:26 AM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
> >
LS,
I uploaded convenience packages to
https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.2.0-RC20250128T0916/ for those
interested.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 9:28 AM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
hanks,
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 12:31 PM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> LS,
>
> As stated in [1] I want to call a freeze on the 4.19 branch this week. My
> plan is still to create an RC by friday
>
> the current state is ,
>
> - 125 closed PRs -
> https://github.com/apache/clou
Hi All,
I've created a 4.19.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.0-RC20250128T0916Commit:
5c6b04f6bfcca575492e97f32a6d1d23b49bdffc
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
loc
Thanks for volunteering Pearl,
Rest assured I will be assisting you as much as I can.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:15 PM Pearl Dsilva wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since we are so close to releasing 4.19.2, and I have been working closely
> with Daan on this release, I thought I could take on the release of
ou tell us. Which release should be used for production ??
I was trying hardly the 4.20 and maybe that is the main problem in my case?
Tata Y
> On Jan 27, 2025, at 8:01 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> yes Ricardo, All fixes will be merged forward to the 4.20 and main
> branches, pr
gt; >
> > From what I've followed, the 4.19 branch has already 100s of issues/PRs
> fixed and ready to create ship a release out of.
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Daan Hooglan
ssues we can still cut
> another RC?
>
> From what I've followed, the 4.19 branch has already 100s of issues/PRs
> fixed and ready to create ship a release out of.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Daan Hoogland
> S
LS,
As stated in [1] I want to call a freeze on the 4.19 branch this week. My
plan is still to create an RC by friday
the current state is ,
- 125 closed PRs -
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A4.19.2+is%3Aclosed
- 39 open PRs and -
https://github.com/apache/clouds
LS,
Github are outfasing their old template mechs for new issues. Please have a
look as https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/10186 .
I propose a new set of templates, in that PR. Please comment or suggest
changes.
regards,
your proposal seems sensible for the most part Slavka, There is just one
concern I have with this
Such behaviour can create several problems. If the primary storage is
> temporarily not accessible, all hosts could reboot.
VMs become dysfunctional if their storage has been inaccessible and become
hey fellow old fellow,
There used to be an IRC channel or two. but they were not very busy, as
slack is now. I think having more DM channels will water down interaction,
so I am not in favor of re-instating or adding channels. Not that I am
against this. I am in favour as I am very much in favour
hey Manoj, Hope you like it "here".
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 11:21 AM Nux wrote:
> Welcome! :)
>
> On 2025-01-06 05:41, Manoj Kumar wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > With great pleasure, I would like to introduce myself to the
> > community. My name is Manoj and I have recently joined Shapeblue as a
> >
Ishita,
I reviewed your proposal, It sparks one question, You mention vmware a lot
of times but do not mention other hypervisor types. Can you add motivation
about that, please?
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 9:15 AM Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Ishita,
>
> You are welcome to do a proposal
Ishita,
You are welcome to do a proposal regarding development on Cloudstack. We
stopped assigning specific issues as GSoC after a few years, one year ago
as the outcome was usually a bit disappointing.
Individual initiative as your own is very much welcomed though. You can
either look for older
nothing to add. I'd +1 this if it comes to a vote.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 6:20 AM Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
> Following the CCC2024 hackathon idea of CloudStack script-based
> installer [1], I want to propose a new repository to host this as a
> sub-project under the ASF/CloudStack PMC. The s
0 out
+ 5th of Februari a release
Let's get as many of the others fixed before then.
@users , please review the issues and comment
on those that have priority for you.
regards,
On 2024/12/03 15:27:11 Daan Hoogland wrote:
> LS,
>
> I want to propose to release 4.19.2 by the end
He Rene and João,
I have opinions about all your points but will not write a long reply to a
long mail, which would only discourage people reading either. Maybe we
should have a zoom meeting or a dev forum on the next CCC about this?
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 9:28 PM João Jandre wrote:
> Hello, Re
LS,
I want to propose to release 4.19.2 by the end of january. This is also me
volunteering to do the RM work.
I want to make an inventory of remaining PRs/issues before the holidays and
assign value. I would like to have a sprint to resolve as many bugs as
possible and test the fixes.
thoughts?
+1 (binding)
verified keys
short monkey testing.
and otherwise based on other people's testing.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 8:51 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Tested by upgrading my local lab env from 4.19.1.3 to 4.20.0.0 RC3 (deb)
> packages on four hosts; three x86 hosts & one aarch64
I would like to see
> > the window extended with a couple of days.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> > Op 20/11/2024 om 12:33 schreef Rohit Yadav:
> >> Thanks Joao,
> >>
> >> Same as others have shared, I'm too at CCC and wouldn't be able to
> >
Yes João, I would like to extend the voting window to halfway next week. Do
you mind? Not many of us will take an opportunity to test .
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 9:22 AM Nux wrote:
> Thank you, Joao, but just FYI a pretty big chunk of us are at the CCC in
> Madrid currently. I expect there'll be
Are there people planning to participate in the hackathon, so far?
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 2:02 PM Ivet Petrova
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a reminder that the CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2024 will
> start with a Hackathon day on November 20th in Madrid.
> In order to kickstart the hack
understood, again, great idea
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:50 AM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> Op 29/10/2024 om 11:11 schreef Daan Hoogland:
> > sounds good @Wido den Hollander ,
> >
> > several questions come to mind (most of them in the realm of 'details
sounds good @Wido den Hollander ,
several questions come to mind (most of them in the realm of 'details':
credentials; can these be operator property or must these be user property
(bring your own)? (or can we configure both setups)
ttl; is there a maximum configurable as well?
record types; do w
@Wido den Hollander , we could look at the git log of the
website and at the mail list archive, but it is easier to remove and add
again I think. It seems to be the only entry under Backup & Disaster
Recovery, while there are others that are implemented; this needs a closer
look.
On Fri, Oct 11,
welcome to the pack of guilty ones, have fun with your new found karma,
Suresh...
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 9:41 AM Boris Stoyanov
wrote:
> Congrats Suresh!
>
> From: Slavka Peleva
> Date: Friday, 20 September 2024 at 8:56 AM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: dev
> Subject: Re: New PMC me
Tom,
You are welcome to submit a PR and we'll happily review it and help you
tackle problems. The framework is there to use and adjust to your needs. As
for the API, what level of stability do you require? I expect some changes
on behalf of you if you are serious about implementing it. The minio is
thanks João,
did you take into account any issues/PRs that may be open for 4.19.2
as well (i.e. bugfixes)? I suspect not, but this could be useful as
well to get an idea of the amount of work. Especially the part we
cannot get done before release.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:34 PM João Jandre Paraqu
+1 (binding)
a bit biased , i can't remember the times I tested 4.19 over the last
couple of months so please test some more. I did check signatures and
these look good.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 5:02 PM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Repeated all of RC1 testing, the blockers are fixed now
people,
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/9385 contains a draft of
what I mean. I think we can make this work. Thanks to Guto who wrote
the views version of this.
any comments welcome
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 2:58 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> good point Wei, So we'll have
good point Wei, So we'll have to create a separate dir/procedure from
that if the views (that need to be created after the tables.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 2:14 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> +1
>
> procedures can be created before db upgrades
>
> -Wei
>
> On Fri, Jul 12,
This is a bit off topic, so renaming the thread. Can we instate a
similar procedure as for views for stored procedures?
it seems to me we can de exactly the same for those stored procedures
and maybe even hijack the views dir so no issues occur with those in
the future. It would guarantee these ar
Gaurav,
please attach the textual errors (screenshots are less helpful and
usually filtered of this mailing list).
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 12:42 PM gaurav joshi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to set up my cloudstack dev environment in Windows but I
> am facing some issues. It will be helpf
ed, we can always remove the
> action if it doesn't work out. And if a PR/issue gets closed, we can always
> reopen it.
>
>
>
> ____
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 2:17 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
nice to see this discussion being had again and sorry to be late in
replying João,
I see no replies have come forward yet. Let's add a new
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/new/choose for this
as well. I still feel my proposal is good and should have been
applied. but we can gather
I think your proposals are ok as an ad-hoc solution to the current
situation @Rohit Yadav . I wonder how we should deal with this in the
future though.
1. As for the numbering, do we have a procedure to prevent this issue
in the future?
2. The provider is part of apache and I think the link
https:
Devs,
I've been getting these errors on main the last few weeks:
~~~
[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR] ActionEventInterceptorTest.testInterceptComplete:247
[ERROR] ActionEventInterceptorTest.testInterceptException:261
[ERROR] ActionEventInterceptorTest.testInterceptStartAsync:234
expected: but was:
~
+1 binding
I checked the hashes alright and the log of commit/tag (Note this last
check is based on the recent TZ issues to make sure nothing slipped
through). Other than that trusting on the testing I was involved in
over the last month or so.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 1:37 PM João Jandre wrote:
>
welcome aboard @slav...@apache.org
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 1:11 PM Ivet Petrova wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Slavka Peleva to become a PMC member and we are pleased
> to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Slavka has contri
Welcome to the group kiran. Now the hard work starts ;)
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 7:46 AM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Kiran Chavala (kiranchavala) to become a committer and
> we are pleased to announce that they have accepted.
>
>
I was pointed out that I did not formally vote in this mai:
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:02 PM Daan wrote:
>
> Kiran, the release looks good, the format of the hashes is a bit off but on
> manual inspection they seem ok. I created a PR to correct thsi for next time
> : https://github.c
ng the same bug (other
> driver) is currently in 4.19.0.
> But I feel bad knowing, that I would introduce a bug for other storage
> drivers.
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:30 AM Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > Rene, is this a blocker (or critical issue) in your opinion ?
Rene, is this a blocker (or critical issue) in your opinion ?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 8:06 AM Rene Peinthor wrote:
>
> -1
>
> Because I would still this to be included:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8790
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:11 PM João Jandre wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'v
nice to see you again Sina ;)
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:10 PM Sina Kashipazha
wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> My name is Sina Kashipazha, and you may remember me from my time at Leaseweb.
> I wanted to take this opportunity to reintroduce myself as I have recently
> joined ComplianceWise.
>
> I work
devs and users,
The PMC have asked Rene Peinthor to become a committer to the Apache
CloudStack project and they have accepted.
Please join me in congratulating Rene.
--
Daan
thanks Rohit,
go Daniel
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:45 PM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> All,
>
> It gives me great pleasure to announce that the ASF board has accepted
> CloudStack PMC resolution of Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador as the next PMC
> Chair / VP of the Apache CloudStack project.
>
> I wou
devs,
currently we have an upgrade path for 4.19.0.0 to 4.19.1.0 in the 4.19 branch
in the main branch we have a 4.19.0.0 to (4.)20.0.0 upgrade path
merging fails because of this and allowing either or both in main will
cause main to fail (at least after upgrading)
If we are sure that 4.19.1 will b
t; Specifically:
> > The community may decide to increment the major version number in
> > situations where underlying implementation details require a cloud operator
> > to face significant challenges in upgrading from one version to the next.
> > This should be rare situation.
&
users and devs,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Vishesh Jindal to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
project since there is no need to go via the patch
submission
et calling them minor versions really underplays the
> > changes it can hold.
> >
> >
> > I'm going to stick in a -1. Not as hard 'no' to any changes, but I think
> > the vote should be on 'A change to the version numbering scheme' and then
&
changes, but I think the
> vote should be on 'A change to the version numbering scheme' and then what is
> proposed properly laid out.
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Releases
> (section on versioning about 2/3 down)
>
>
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be
counted please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning
scheme. The result would be that the next major version will be 20
instead of 4.20, as it would be in a traditional upgrade
ill plan to introduce disruptive changes (in a cautious and
> structured way) in the major versions, all my concerns are met; I do not
> have further technical reasons to keep the "4.".
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
>
> On 2/12/24 11:55, Daan Hoogla
i'm a bit -0 on this. I agree that a lot of stale issues deserve
closing, but others are really long term goals. I do not want to block
this great idea but am just a bit worried about other great ideas
getting lost. So I would propose to tag anything we close or not
remove the stale tag, so these c
bump,
@Daniel Salvador is there any technical reason to keep the 4? any
reason why there must be a 5 instead of a 21, 22 or 23? We are
maintaining 4 number semantic versioning for no reason, as I see it.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:02 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> Daniel, "technical&q
no worries as João proposed to release 4.18.2 in march, but let's
make sure we have a good period between the two.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 12:50 PM Suresh Anaparti
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> CloudStack 4.19.0.0 is the latest LTS release. There are already some open
> issues [1] and pull requests [2
fact that Huawei has still not answered my request to
> publish the OBS SDK with Maven coordinates, I assume that this is the
> "chinese way" of saying "Nope, not going to happen!".
sounds so :(
>
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> R. Feicht
>
> sc syn
devs (and PMC),
I created a procedure based on a staging->production promotion of PRs.
it is described in the readme file [1]
I went ahead and created it as we didn't have anything before. That
does not mean I get to decide on my own, so please add your unsalted
comment or create/add change propo
People,
we brought the new website. Please all have a look at
https://cloudstack.apache.org
thanks for any feedback
--
Daan
The vote has passed with
6 * +1
0 * 0
0* -1
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:32 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> LS,
>
> I am not sure this is still needed after all the discussions
> before,but I would like to start a lazy consent vote threat anyway
> there are some non-blocking rest point
thanks Abhi, for all the hard work.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:37 PM Abhishek Kumar wrote:
>
> The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache CloudStack Project Announces
> Apache® CloudStack® v4.19.
>
> Apache CloudStack 4.19 is the most recent release of the cloud management
> platform. It comes
LS,
I am not sure this is still needed after all the discussions
before,but I would like to start a lazy consent vote threat anyway
there are some non-blocking rest points mentioned and we can
administer those in the repo for the site [1]
so without further ado;
Do we want to go life with the web
Ronald,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:02 AM Ronald Feicht
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have only lately found out, that I cannot use the publicly available
> Java SDK for Huawei Object Storage (which has Maven coordinates) as this
> SDK only works for the public Huawei Cloud, not for local non-cloud
> devic
_
> From: Sven Vogel
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 18:30
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ;
> priv...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users
> Subject: Re: new website design
>
> +1 looks nice
>
> Am Montag, den 01/22/2024 um 11:46 schrieb Nux:
signatures ok,
+1 (binding)
will also do a monkey test on simulator and retract my +1 if needed ;)
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:58 AM Abhishek Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC4), with the following artifacts up for
> a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://gi
Daniel, "technical" reasons for dropping the 4 are all in the field of
social engineering. In practice (as I think Wei also described) we are
already treating the "minor" version number as major version. Since
4.0 or 4.1 (don´t remember) there has been renewed talk of a 5 , but
never enough reason
1 - 100 of 3725 matches
Mail list logo
