As I understand this, it is a regression. This makes it a blocker according to 'tradition'. I am closing this vote and will call a new one, once we have a fix.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:07 AM Kiran Chavala <kiran.chav...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Hi All > > -1, > > - Found that vmware to kvm import is failing when there are no tags on > offerings and storage > > Exception message > > 2025-02-17 07:15:49,955 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher] > (API-Job-Executor-55:ctx-5df1409d job-102) (logid:489f7475) Unexpected > exception while executing > org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.ImportVmCmd > java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 1 out of bounds for length 1 > > > > Regards > Kiran > > > From: Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves <bernardomg2...@gmail.com> > Date: Saturday, 15 February 2025 at 7:16 PM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 RC3 > +1, here are the workflows I tested: > > - Verified that the database upgrade script was successfully executed; > - Created domains and accounts within them; > - Registered new templates; > - Created VPCs; > - Created VPCs tiers; > - Registered SSH key pairs; > - Deployed VMs; > - Verified CPVM access; > - Dynamically scaled VMs; > - Performed VMs lifecycle operations; > - Created and reverted instance snapshots; > - Created and reverted volume snapshots; > - Created templates from volume snapshots; > - Created volumes from volume snapshots; > - Attached and detached disks; > - Created k8s clusters; > - Enabled and disabled k8s clusters autoscaling; > - Scaled up the number of k8s clusters worker nodes; > - Scaled down the number of k8s clusters worker nodes; > - Changed k8s cluster service offering; > - Upgraded k8s cluster version; > - Configured guest networks egress rules; > - Configured public IPs port forwarding and firewall; > - Configured static NAT public IPs. > > The tests were performed in a local environment based on KVM and NFS, > upgraded from the 4.19.1.3 version. > > Best regards, > Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves (bernardodemarco) > > Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2025 às 16:57, Rohit Yadav < > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > escreveu: > > > Thanks Daan, it was in nested/in-line email so I missed that. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 21:17 > > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 RC3 > > > > Rohit, test packages were shared (see below in the quoted mail): > > > > > Test packages can be found at > > > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.2-rc3/ > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 4:22 PM Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > I did basic tree check and built el8 rpm packages using Daan’s RC2 git > > > tree/sha. Basic install and lifecycle tests went okay. > > > > > > As convenience packages were not shared I built my own, available from > > > here: > > > https://build.yadav.cloud/cloudstack/4.19.2.0-RC2/<< > https://build.yadav.cloud/cloudstack/4.19.2.0-RC2/%3c> > > > https://build.yadav.cloud/cloudstack/4.19.2.0-RC2/el8/4.19/>< > https://build.yadav.cloud/cloudstack/4.19.2.0-RC2/el8/4.19/%3e> > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Rene Peinthor <rene.peint...@linbit.com> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 8:02:36 PM > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > > > Cc: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 RC3 > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Did basic tests and the integration tests with Linstor as primary > > storage. > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:22 AM Daan Hoogland <d...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > as promised,... > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 5:31 PM Daan Hoogland <d...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > I've created a 4.19.2.0 release candidate, with the following > > > > > artifacts up for a vote: > > > > > > > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.0-RC20250212T1722 > > > > > Commit: 7f0eed39419b6076eed8db39a8cd3be326a49a2d > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > > > > > location): > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.2.0/ > > > > > > > > > > PGP release keys (signed using > > > 256ABDFB8D89EDE07540BE6ACEF9E802B86FEED4): > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > > > > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am in the process of creating convenience packages and will > update > > on > > > > > those in this mail-thread. > > > > > > > > > Test packages can be found at > > > > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.2-rc3/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > Daan (dahn) Hoogland > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan > > > > > > -- Daan
