Re: [I] Missing API support [cloudstack-go]

DaanHoogland closed issue #22: Missing API support URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/issues/22 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [PR] Add missing API calls for Cloudstack 4.20 [cloudstack-go]

DaanHoogland merged PR #91: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/91 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudst

[PR] Add Resource Limits to Backups and Object Storage [cloudstack-documentation]

abh1sar opened a new pull request, #461: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/461 Doc PR for https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/10017 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the U

Re: [PR] Add missing API calls for Cloudstack 4.20 [cloudstack-go]

Pearl1594 commented on PR #91: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/91#issuecomment-2546826849 Thanks @phsm - tests now run successfully! Thank you :+1: -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

Re: [I] Cannot create acl_rule - Root resource was present, but now absent. [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

CodeBleu commented on issue #129: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/129#issuecomment-2545996468 > > @AlexanderKgr what is the Cloudstack version and Cloudstack terraform provider version you are using > > I am not facing the issue with the latest terrafo

Re: [PR] Add missing API calls for Cloudstack 4.20 [cloudstack-go]

phsm commented on PR #91: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/91#issuecomment-2545978224 @Pearl1594 This was to tidy up an abandoned https://github.com/golang/mock/ package. The authors there suggest to switch to a maintained fork instead. I replaced the rest of the

Re: [PR] Add missing API calls for Cloudstack 4.20 [cloudstack-go]

phsm commented on code in PR #91: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/91#discussion_r1887053442 ## generate/layout.go: ## @@ -790,16 +864,92 @@ var layout = apiInfo{ "RegistrationService": { "registerOauthProvider", }, - "Shutd

Re: [PR] Add missing API calls for Cloudstack 4.20 [cloudstack-go]

Pearl1594 commented on PR #91: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/91#issuecomment-2545895377 For some reason, the tests seem to fail on this PR - @phsm can you please help us with this: I needed to make the following changes to make it work - I am not sure why the 1st two

Re: [PR] Add missing API calls for Cloudstack 4.20 [cloudstack-go]

Pearl1594 commented on code in PR #91: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/91#discussion_r1886985264 ## generate/layout.go: ## @@ -790,16 +864,92 @@ var layout = apiInfo{ "RegistrationService": { "registerOauthProvider", }, - "

Re: [PR] Add missing API calls for Cloudstack 4.20 [cloudstack-go]

phsm commented on PR #91: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/91#issuecomment-2545574592 @DaanHoogland updated both the code, and the PR header/description. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use

[PR] Fixed formatting warnings [cloudstack-documentation]

sp-techdocs opened a new pull request, #460: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/460 Fixed several formatting issues, thus reducing the number of warnings reported during a Sphinx build from 1119 to 996. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.