weizhouapache commented on PR #79:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/79#issuecomment-1980244081
@vishesh92
there are some more params in @shwstppr 's PR #77
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Git
weizhouapache commented on PR #79:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/79#issuecomment-1980241864
good job ! @vishesh92
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
vishesh92 commented on code in PR #57:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/57#discussion_r1513896738
##
cloudstack/resource_cloudstack_configuration.go:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or
vishesh92 commented on code in PR #57:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/57#discussion_r1513895386
##
cloudstack/resource_cloudstack_private_gateway.go:
##
@@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ func resourceCloudStackPrivateGatewayCreate(d
*schema.ResourceData, m
vishesh92 commented on code in PR #57:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/57#discussion_r1513894181
##
cloudstack/resource_cloudstack_instance.go:
##
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ func resourceCloudStackInstanceUpdate(d
*schema.ResourceData, meta interface
vishesh92 commented on code in PR #57:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/57#discussion_r1513890780
##
cloudstack/provider.go:
##
@@ -84,13 +84,12 @@ func Provider() terraform.ResourceProvider {
ResourcesMap: map[string]*schema.Res
vishesh92 commented on code in PR #64:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/64#discussion_r1513882158
##
cloudstack/resource_cloudstack_service_offering.go:
##
@@ -42,6 +42,61 @@ func resourceCloudStackServiceOffering() *schema.Resource {
rohityadavcloud closed issue #41: Please include "noderootdisksize" in
"resource_cloudstack_kubernetes_cluster.go"
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/41
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
rohityadavcloud merged PR #90:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/90
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
rohityadavcloud closed issue #58: details changes are not beeing applied
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/58
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
rohityadavcloud merged PR #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/91
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
rohityadavcloud closed issue #48: error retrieving ID of zone all: No match
found for all: &{Count:0 Zones:[]}
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/48
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
rohityadavcloud merged PR #92:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/92
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
kiranchavala commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-1980094048
@poddm could you please help in resolving the conflicts
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
Daniel, Daan, others,
Could you explain why you’d break CloudStack’s rest-like APIs? Isn’t the
intention of dropping the 4. as we may never see a 5.x that involves major
changes involving API incompatibility?
Regards.
From: Guto Veronezi
Sent: Wednesday, Ma
shwstppr closed pull request #77: restore methods with 4.19 optional API params
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/77
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comme
By agreeing to drop the "4" I think we're effectively voting and agreeing that
we'll not be breaking APIs.
That is not what was discussed in the thread [1]. If we agree that we
will not break APIs, I am -1 on dropping the "4". We need to create a
protocol along with the proposal, otherwise, we
vishesh92 opened a new pull request, #79:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/79
Addresses https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/issues/70 &
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/77
cc: @shwstppr @rohityadavcloud @weizhouapache
--
This is an automated messag
Hi Rohit, thank you
So to recap;
Semantic versioning goes (in our use):
. . .
And as I understand it you're looking to go
. .
Starting from 20
I'd ask the question - are there any big/disruptive changes people would want
to bundle together to keep the semantic versioning and move to 5
Great!
Thanks Swen!
-Wei
On Tuesday, March 5, 2024, Ivet Petrova wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Will be Frankfurt. Swen from proIO is really excited to help us organise,
> so we have somebody on place to support, which is really cool.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
> On 1 Mar 2024, at 11:06, Wido den Hollan
kiranchavala commented on issue #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/18#issuecomment-1979156884
@synergiator
Not able to reproduce the issue able to deploy instance by giving the
template name, tested on the latest cloudstack 4.19 release.
kiranchavala commented on issue #28:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/28#issuecomment-1979110909
@vishesh92
Need to add networkid parameter to the "resource_cloudstack_network_acl"
https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.19/apis/
As I understand Daan's vote proposal and from the previous discussion thread,
the current scheme that results in a release like 4.20.x.y would simply become
20.a.b, wherein "a" is for maintenance release (counter, starting with 0) and
"b" is only used for security releases (counter, starting wit
kiranchavala commented on issue #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/32#issuecomment-1979008581
@kohrar
I am not hitting the issue on the latest build.
Let me know if i can close the issue
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terrafo
kiranchavala commented on PR #84:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/84#issuecomment-1978968098
Closed the PR as it' majorly already covered by #77
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
kiranchavala closed pull request #84: Added encrypt and tags option to disk
offering
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/84
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
kiranchavala commented on issue #31:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/31#issuecomment-1978939126
@Pearl1594
Not able to reproduce the issue, I was able to deploy a vm and add secondary
IP to a NIC for a VM in a project.
Let me know if can cl
Hi all,
The CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2024 will happen in Nov - 20-22 in
Madrid, Spain.
With some community members we are now researching for the best venue for the
event.
Although we have a lot of time, we have started slowly the organisation.
There are a few things we need to decide
kiranchavala closed issue #29: Registry 404 error - failed to │ retrieve
authentication checksums for provider
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/29
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
kiranchavala commented on issue #29:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/29#issuecomment-1978725813
Closing the issue as the issue is not observed anymore
@synergiator please reopen if you are observing the issue again
--
This is an automated messag
kiranchavala commented on issue #68:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/68#issuecomment-1978716001
@vishesh92
We need to add the parameter "overridediskofferingid" to the resource
cloudstack_instance
https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4
kiranchavala commented on issue #72:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/72#issuecomment-1978593625
@vdombrovski
I have cross-checked the issue and disk resize is happening when you use a
custom disk offering
