[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] andrijapanicsb commented on issue #76: new systeVM template is required for even 4.11.3

2019-10-21 Thread GitBox
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #76: new systeVM template is required for even 4.11.3 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/76#issuecomment-544475221 @nvazquez this is from 4.11.3 o 4.13 - the default name "routing-" is not recognized from 4.13 code and thus t

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] andrijapanicsb merged pull request #76: new systeVM template is required for even 4.11.3

2019-10-21 Thread GitBox
andrijapanicsb merged pull request #76: new systeVM template is required for even 4.11.3 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/76 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] nvazquez commented on issue #76: new systeVM template is required for even 4.11.3

2019-10-21 Thread GitBox
nvazquez commented on issue #76: new systeVM template is required for even 4.11.3 URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/76#issuecomment-544473993 @andrijapanicsb is that error only for VMware? I've upgraded a couple of times successfully from 4.11.2 to 4.11.3 regist

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]merge policy ratification

2019-10-21 Thread Boris Stoyanov
I strongly agree with this. There should be at least 2 LGTMs and a proof it's being tested(logs, pictures etc..) Bobby. On 2.10.19, 14:37, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: LS, in the past we had set a set of rules in the community under which PR could be merged. I want to reiterate them h

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Primate as modern UI for CloudStack

2019-10-21 Thread Andrija Panic
(that seems like more +1s than for last few ACS releases altogether :) ) Great work Rohit - thx! On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 08:57, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > After 2 weeks, the vote for accepting Primate as a CloudStack project [1] > *passes* with > 10 PMC + 11 non-PMC votes. > > +1 (PMC / bindi