Lol - with great power comes great responsibility David!
Actually this is a discussion thread, once any issues which people may raise
are ironed out I expect Rohit will start a VOTE on a concrete proposal and
timeline.
-- For anyone not used to this process, now would be a good time to explain
I like the idea of separating the UI from the main code base. I think that will
provide a lot more flexibility moving forward and the project is well overdue
for a new look and feel.
I think the time frame proposed to sunset the old UI is doable and we'll need
some feedback from those using it t
+1 to the new UI as it supports:
1. Faster development of features
2. Better experience as a user
3. Easy customisation declaratively
Regards,
Anurag
> On 20-Sep-2019, at 8:17 AM, Siddhartha Kattoju wrote:
>
> +1 from me as well.
>
> Just a side note: I feel like there is a high risk of tldr
+1 from me as well.
Just a side note: I feel like there is a high risk of tldr here. May be its
just me. It may be would be good to put most of the details in a wiki page
and just post a summarized version on the list ?
*Sid Kattoju*
Cloud Software Architect | Professional Services
c 514.466.09
Hi Andrija,
Thanks for your work.
Can you share the YouTube link if its ready?
Cheers
Sven
__
Sven Vogel
Teamlead Platform
EWERK DIGITAL GmbH
Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P +49 341 42649 - 99
F +49 341 42649 - 98
s.vo...@ewerk.com
www.ewerk.com
Geschäftsführer:
Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schuber
onitake commented on issue #6: Improved Ingress Controller example to be
clearer and more complete
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/6#issuecomment-533546965
What's wrong with Træfik? :smiley:
I think an example for both would be even better. Feel f
joschi36 commented on issue #6: Improved Ingress Controller example to be
clearer and more complete
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/6#issuecomment-533543728
maybe we could use the nginx-ingress to be a little more "standard/basic*?
--
onitake opened a new pull request #6: Improved Ingress Controller example to be
clearer and more complete
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/6
This PR expands the Ingress Controller example to a minimal viable config.
It should illustrate the concept b
Hi Rohit,
been on CCC19NA and I'm fine with the whole idea (having seen everything,
etc.)
One thing to clarify: you mentioned "old UI reaches EOL in Winter lts 2020,
old UI codebase is removed from codebase" - but later stated, that since we
support LTS until 2022, that means "but, with no new UI
All,
== Summary ==
I have been working on a new, modern role-based UI for Cloudstack (project
Primate: https://github.com/shapeblue/primate) I demoed this for the first time
at CCCNA19 last week and it was very well received. It was discussed, at
length, as an item in the hackathon and the
The new UI will be the best step forward. I think auto generated UI needs also
a design and not only an api list.
Thanks Wei for the PR...
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
__
Sven Vogel
Teamlead Platform
EWERK DIGITAL GmbH
Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P +49 341 42649 - 99
F +49 341 42649 - 98
s.vo...
onitake opened a new issue #5: Submit request to integrate into Kubernetes
documentation
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/5
Now that transfer to the ASF is complete, the project should be submitted to
be advertised as the "official" CloudStack provider f
onitake opened a new issue #4: [OLD] Document how to run a fully simulated
dev/test environment
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/4
Moved from:
https://github.com/swisstxt/cloudstack-cloud-controller-manager/issues/6
The documentation should state
onitake opened a new issue #3: [OLD] Implement IP whitelists
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/3
Moved from:
https://github.com/swisstxt/cloudstack-cloud-controller-manager/issues/7
Other CCMs/cloud providers support source IP whitelisting via
`sp
onitake opened a new issue #2: [OLD] Changing from TCP to TCP Proxy doesn't
work
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/2
Moved from:
https://github.com/swisstxt/cloudstack-cloud-controller-manager/issues/8
I tried changing from TCP to TCP-Proxy (with
Hi Gregor,
Agree that it would be nice to have a better UI.
However, I am not a frontend developer. The settings are not set frequently
so we think it is good enough.
Let's see what we can improve when we have a new cloudstack UI (proposed by
Rohit on CCC NA 19).
-Wei
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 08
16 matches
Mail list logo
